GNU bug report logs - #74736
[PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #228 received at 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel <at> crazy-compilers.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#74736: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:43:40 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Ludo,

Am 13.01.25 um 22:17 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hartmut Goebel<h.goebel <at> crazy-compilers.com> skribis:
>
>
>> Section "Deliberate period": IMHO "deliberation" is the wrong term, since the team members send in their votes. I suggest calling it "Voting
>> Period", even if someone might argue that in consent based decision making, "deliberation" is the term to use.
> I proposed “Voting Period” but we eventually considered that
> “Deliberation Period” would better represent what this is.

After reading <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/74736#70> I now 
understood that the base idea behind decision making is "Consensus". 
This is mentioned in "motivation", but rather like a side note than as 
an important principle.

Therefore I propose moving the section "Decision Making" into 
"Motivation" – or make it a top-level section just below "Motivation".

>> Section "Deliberate period":The 25% are to be counted at which valuation date? I propose:
> You propose what? :-)

:-)

"… 25% of all team members – as of the start of the Deliberation Period – …"



-- 
Regards
Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          |h.goebel <at> crazy-compilers.com               |
|www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.