GNU bug report logs - #74736
[PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>

Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:29:02 UTC

Severity: important

Tags: patch

Merged with 66844

Done: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #186 received at 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: indieterminacy <indieterminacy <at> libre.brussels>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>, guix-maintainers <at> gnu.org,
 zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com, ludo <at> gnu.org, mail <at> cbaines.net,
 efraim <at> flashner.co.il, rekado <at> elephly.net, guix-devel <at> gnu.org,
 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Guix Common Document process (v7)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 21:50:21 +0000
Hello Andreas,

On 2025-01-15 15:34, Andreas Enge wrote:
> ...
> 
> Concerning consensus, I am mildly worried about deadlocks (including
> when trying to modify this RFC/GCD). What happens if some person 
> insists
> on disapproving? (I am reminded of the European Union where one member
> state can effectively hold the others hostage over certain issues.)
> The RFC/GCD says: "A team member sending this reply should have made
> constructive comments during the discussion period." What if they have
> not? How about adding a quorum of "disapprove" votes to have effect?
> (Actually in Europe *two* member states are needed for a veto in the
> Council.)
> 

I wonder whether the 'political ability' of somebody being able to use 
deadlock leavers
should be limited to those who are active/recent members.

Does it seem sensible to have this in place already?

> Notice also that the suggestion bootstraps the team members into a
> decision taking body - so far we have added people more or less 
> randomly
> to teams. For instance, team members need not have commit rights and
> thus be vetted by three fellow committers. So should we replace "team
> members" by "committers"? Or keep the proposal as is and immediately
> work on a new GCD to somehow safeguard the addition of people to a 
> team?
> 

Btw, thanks Andreas for your work as Treasurer!

See you in Brussels soon,


Jonathan




This bug report was last modified 90 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.