GNU bug report logs - #74736
[PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: reza <reza <at> housseini.me>, 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ludo <at> gnu.org
Cc: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>, Noé Lopez <noelopez <at> free.fr>, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: [bug#74736] [PATCH v6] Add Request-for-Comments process.
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:22:05 +0100

Hi,

On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 at 06:33, reza via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> As a maybe tangential comment: There is no mention of an identifier
> for an RFC (e.g. PEP number) or a unique string to identify or
> reference it?

I think there is one: the first one is 001 and then they will be
incremented.  For instance, assuming v6, it would be: RFC 001, or RFC
001-rfc-process.

Is it clearer?

Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.