From unknown Sat Aug 09 15:57:08 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#7467 <7467@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#7467 <7467@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Could nxml-mode avoid reindenting
...
? Reply-To: bug#7467 <7467@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2025 22:57:08 +0000 retitle 7467 Could nxml-mode avoid reindenting
...
? reassign 7467 emacs submitter 7467 Lennart Borgman severity 7467 wishlist thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 22 12:42:43 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2010 17:42:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKaPb-0007lR-40 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:42:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKaPZ-0007lM-IU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:42:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKaUd-0007ie-SG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:47:57 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:49047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKaUd-0007iU-Pe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:47:55 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43394 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKaUc-0007NX-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:47:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKaUb-0007hy-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:47:54 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:42938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKaUb-0007ho-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:47:53 -0500 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so4032134ewy.0 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:47:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=gXncB/+Sk2tvrX8+9lK7v0XjJVQ6yXyik+lB3dPy2ME=; b=VNqMNS0tMDReb8KPjNE990irP+rsNmuAqSdT2b8bvA3yQ2ZD0eKUMZ+nwFg1yTsCUA czytP9i+ghavNd6dRpf/YhAWFPxuyheLSydVMQgXyUaDMpSdv+A6d5I9PFCvSWTj38x9 fD+WVNEzwh3TZ+VNj6Pb45y6B0iUaYggr29nA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Gw6R2BqqsACsm2KBotPZBbhgbUBG3QykCZwAPBUoJgxAlnIp/4piFiP3ARAQ7EDP94 2cJYzcIPwbbNbJtfq3F3Y61t5Fxw3lglcSEsKypqAhh8cA1hFgh6gFOl4Ago9prUT17V C2a9UCpj6/oxcBEFkmuNtcMfyqKB89cwK0f6Y= Received: by 10.213.34.20 with SMTP id j20mr4955056ebd.71.1290448072450; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:47:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.22.135 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:47:32 -0800 (PST) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:47:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Could nxml-mode avoid reindenting
...
? To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) Since the content in
...
is preformatted it would be good if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 22 17:52:06 2010 Received: (at 7467) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2010 22:52:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKfF0-0001MK-Kx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:52:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKfEz-0001Ly-3I for 7467@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:52:05 -0500 Received: by pwj2 with SMTP id 2so1795498pwj.3 for <7467@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:57:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=+GjdVE7W/A0b9Il2v3RtKd2csinStT/jVsAJ3oVvDe0=; b=pkD0ZkVyWZOQNIZNW+xY3H5QS3cbbWlP4o/aoGsl9HP13kFIznl9qUxIf834eS0TEW 3tIcT9Kg9Zagi+0D9Pz7j3Hkn1pX6W5/BYm1SokLcHOU918RWDQjBz+XtqN5uUp8Mpvw CgJrSdsWN6S24Li5t6cmO0Eqd2WGxeWW41KC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=LTRRI2eNsbzRke2qOwqDRlp9lPD+2db0vPPJDHI7j/4dGtIU0PmQ0Xl4gf4QLKPazx rQ6CS1gD7JIv27i//qPNkMrQMql2gjKLbwUmaD95ahMRPHVm0cXJotNaLldI0A8uQ/fp LZVCi8bMhv2F8agorZqYii1xDz1+5+AnS+kcU= Received: by 10.143.11.19 with SMTP id o19mr5735167wfi.100.1290466640777; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([120.140.38.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w42sm7019844wfh.3.2010.11.22.14.57.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:57:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 747401BE7; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:57:14 +0800 (MYT) From: Jason Rumney To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#7467: Could nxml-mode avoid reindenting
...
? References: Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:57:14 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:47:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87hbf9t19x.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7467 Cc: 7467@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lennart Borgman writes: > Since the content in
...
is preformatted it would be good > if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation. XML attaches no such semantic meaning to tags. Maybe it would be useful for nxml-mode to have a more general way for the user to specify not to indent within a block denoted by a tag. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 22 18:03:13 2010 Received: (at 7467) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2010 23:03:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKfPk-0001Qd-Sg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:03:13 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKfPj-0001QY-KD for 7467@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:03:12 -0500 Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so4399257eyd.3 for <7467@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:08:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bu+OyAkH8PHTA0hm6KbPOU8dayt3D9ZkqVh+ddZTXNE=; b=ZbUKiP2Hb0e5sTZE9rrVzVgU78/Y3RvniVmsWkX6YO6CLIDbRLo8IqtgujWETTsZE+ rOqP/O1QyplrE31XRiugfnGPdrdUG9bvSoE1dT5H8kJujx8VRDI/ZUct23vBkU4XH/jt 6tLGrScFyK2sPt8n4jA7ABXosANpjO4endm+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=NdQWRSKoouz1sX1MVCA20ssu9g8inORTrnhLWvRKE64J4DKklrtdIjq/qEI2BU5Zyd rb2M6+XXpa0PLZicz0/PF5cx+naFmd+Hk/Y+Y12H6XdNWvgewUI7uenAgzQA6TooIPeR foUZOezChIItdUu9IpMva8tBp4+S1JsFzS5p8= Received: by 10.213.34.20 with SMTP id j20mr5499862ebd.71.1290467307197; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:08:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.22.135 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:08:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87hbf9t19x.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> References: <87hbf9t19x.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:08:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#7467: Could nxml-mode avoid reindenting
...
? To: Jason Rumney Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7467 Cc: 7467@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> Since the content in
...
is preformatted it would be good >> if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation. > > XML attaches no such semantic meaning to tags. > > Maybe it would be useful for nxml-mode to have a more general way for > the user to specify not to indent within a block denoted by a > tag. Yes, it should probably be more general to allow for specific handling of certain tags in certain DTD:s, for example
 in XHTML.




From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 18 08:23:33 2021
Received: (at 7467) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 12:23:33 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from )
	id 1m55pU-0002sU-OZ
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:32 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33544)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from ) id 1m55pT-0002sD-Fe
 for 7467@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=1A4Vzo/1bPT4ZuIOW4p+4nR3T+NPy1foKSbRb5FbKUU=; b=Nse3ncbnf6dCxoKoIwyT/CEiXd
 gIHv3iG1+gys0/wD9wjOMkEILDwd9Su5beQUCSxoMZYEzExq6sAD1Rl3dJVEkGUxj4tl55EoQvjAa
 FhP3XIg6dnZdVmWYzK9lbW895zN8rANhFXr04y2eavwClXoya3XWG5z/ev33MF/N3F9Q=;
Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from )
 id 1m55pL-0000Un-4x; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:25 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen 
To: Jason Rumney 
Subject: Re: bug#7467: Could nxml-mode avoid reindenting 
...
? References: <87hbf9t19x.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> X-Now-Playing: The Meters's _Gettin' Funkier All The Time (1): Here Comes The Meter Man & Looka-Ya Py Py_: "Stormy" Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87hbf9t19x.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> (Jason Rumney's message of "Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:57:14 +0800") Message-ID: <87v957stdx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jason Rumney writes: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> Since the content in
...
is preformatted it would be good >> if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation. > > XML attaches [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7467 Cc: Lennart Borgman , 7467@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Jason Rumney writes: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> Since the content in
...
is preformatted it would be good >> if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation. > > XML attaches no such semantic meaning to tags. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) Yeah, I think it'd be wrong for nxml-mode to do anything special with
.  html-mode, on the other hand, should respect 
, and there a
separate bug report for that.

So I'm closing this bug report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 18 08:23:37 2021
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 12:23:37 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from )
	id 1m55pZ-0002sk-0d
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:37 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33560)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from ) id 1m55pX-0002sJ-Ej
 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=4Bv1J62aoCjJcgkqsA/iQHfst2EoGUGft6CAabpdSJ0=; b=V6aReVPBZmGpZc2OCRdDcsFYPE
 EUFdUPQNfONwzEeIk9PLPE5bgbuSm0r3QPDpJanBgr8+TTeJ7xqnmeBGrt+2DHKWirCxs/3MROfSd
 HTFy49XvadSNGNXKZmq+eIH93e3acwj5bup4qmg5luWifVG2Saf3otcGDisSkFU0GYvA=;
Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m55pP-0000Uw-TD
 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:29 +0200
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:27 +0200
Message-Id: <87tukrstds.fsf@gnus.org>
To: control@debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen 
Subject: control message for bug #7467
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  close 7467 quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: 
List-Unsubscribe: , 
 
List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: , 
 
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" 
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

close 7467 
quit





From unknown Sat Aug 09 15:57:08 2025
Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage;
To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org
From: Debbugs Internal Request 
Subject: Internal Control
Message-Id: bug archived.
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:24:06 +0000
User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9

# This is a fake control message.
#
# The action:
# bug archived.
thanks
# This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs
# administrator