writes:
>
>> Since the content in ...
is preformatted it would be good
>> if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation.
>
> XML attaches no such semantic meaning to tags.
>
> Maybe it would be useful for nxml-mode to have a more general way for
> the user to specify not to indent within a block denoted by a
> tag.
Yes, it should probably be more general to allow for specific handling
of certain tags in certain DTD:s, for example in XHTML.
From unknown Sun Aug 10 00:43:38 2025
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: bug#7467: Could nxml-mode avoid reindenting ...
?
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit"
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:24:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID:
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7467
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Jason Rumney
Cc: Lennart Borgman , 7467@debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 7467-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7467.162661101311071
(code B ref 7467); Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:24:02 +0000
Received: (at 7467) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 12:23:33 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from )
id 1m55pU-0002sU-OZ
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:32 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33544)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from ) id 1m55pT-0002sD-Fe
for 7467@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=1A4Vzo/1bPT4ZuIOW4p+4nR3T+NPy1foKSbRb5FbKUU=; b=Nse3ncbnf6dCxoKoIwyT/CEiXd
gIHv3iG1+gys0/wD9wjOMkEILDwd9Su5beQUCSxoMZYEzExq6sAD1Rl3dJVEkGUxj4tl55EoQvjAa
FhP3XIg6dnZdVmWYzK9lbW895zN8rANhFXr04y2eavwClXoya3XWG5z/ev33MF/N3F9Q=;
Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva)
by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92) (envelope-from )
id 1m55pL-0000Un-4x; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:25 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen
References:
<87hbf9t19x.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net>
X-Now-Playing: The Meters's _Gettin' Funkier All The Time (1): Here Comes
The Meter Man & Looka-Ya Py Py_: "Stormy"
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87hbf9t19x.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> (Jason Rumney's message of
"Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:57:14 +0800")
Message-ID: <87v957stdx.fsf@gnus.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Jason Rumney writes: > Lennart Borgman
writes: > >> Since the content in ...
is preformatted it would
be good >> if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation. > > XML
attaches [...]
Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit"
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
Jason Rumney writes:
> Lennart Borgman writes:
>
>> Since the content in ...
is preformatted it would be good
>> if nxml-mode did not reformat it during indentation.
>
> XML attaches no such semantic meaning to tags.
(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved
at the time.)
Yeah, I think it'd be wrong for nxml-mode to do anything special with
. html-mode, on the other hand, should respect , and there a
separate bug report for that.
So I'm closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 18 08:23:37 2021
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 12:23:37 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from )
id 1m55pZ-0002sk-0d
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:37 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33560)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from ) id 1m55pX-0002sJ-Ej
for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:23:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=4Bv1J62aoCjJcgkqsA/iQHfst2EoGUGft6CAabpdSJ0=; b=V6aReVPBZmGpZc2OCRdDcsFYPE
EUFdUPQNfONwzEeIk9PLPE5bgbuSm0r3QPDpJanBgr8+TTeJ7xqnmeBGrt+2DHKWirCxs/3MROfSd
HTFy49XvadSNGNXKZmq+eIH93e3acwj5bup4qmg5luWifVG2Saf3otcGDisSkFU0GYvA=;
Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva)
by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m55pP-0000Uw-TD
for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:29 +0200
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:23:27 +0200
Message-Id: <87tukrstds.fsf@gnus.org>
To: control@debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen
Subject: control message for bug #7467
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: close 7467 quit
Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit"
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
close 7467
quit