GNU bug report logs - #74613
fortunes-jkirchartz is missing python input

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab <at> web.de>
Subject: bug#74613: closed (Re: fortunes-jkirchartz is missing python input)
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 13:56:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#74613: fortunes-jkirchartz is missing python input

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 74613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
74613: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74613
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab <at> web.de>
Cc: 74613-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: fortunes-jkirchartz is missing python input
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 14:55:41 +0100

Am Samstag, dem 30.11.2024 um 21:28 +0100 schrieb Dr. Arne
Babenhauserheide:
> Hi Liliana,
> 
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > As nothing whatsoever is written, this may be already on the first
> > line, but with the ostream likely being buffered could be any of
> > those writes.  I'll dig deeper once I have some more time.
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> Best wishes,
> Arne
Pushed my fix as eafd91c26232f039a3170b73e40b0a2d5983c474.

Cheers

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab <at> web.de>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: fortunes-jkirchartz is missing python input
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 02:09:20 +0100

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

the build for fortunes-jkirchartz fails:

`/gnu/store/hax39blb0f62cnax7n92hcxkw5k4jymq-fortunes-jkirchartz-0-0.2e32ba0-checkout/bin/goodreadsquotes.py' -> `./bin/goodreadsquotes.py'
phase `unpack' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `patch-source'
phase `patch-source' succeeded after 0.1 seconds
starting phase `patch-usr-bin-file'
phase `patch-usr-bin-file' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `patch-source-shebangs'
patch-shebang: ./bin/azquotes.py: warning: no binary for interpreter `python' found in $PATH
patch-shebang: ./bin/goodreadsquotes.py: warning: no binary for interpreter `python' found in $PATH
phase `patch-source-shebangs' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `patch-generated-file-shebangs'
patch-shebang: ./bin/azquotes.py: warning: no binary for interpreter `python' found in $PATH
patch-shebang: ./bin/goodreadsquotes.py: warning: no binary for interpreter `python' found in $PATH
phase `patch-generated-file-shebangs' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `build'
egrep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E
make: *** [Makefile:10: AClaude.dat] Aborted
make: *** Deleting file 'AClaude.dat'
error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: () exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> 
phase `build' failed after 0.0 seconds
command "make" failed with status 2
build process 18 exited with status 256

It may just miss python as input (or propagated input?).

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.