GNU bug report logs - #74561
[PATCH] Allow limiting the size of *Completions*

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
Cc: sbaugh <at> catern.com, juri <at> linkov.net, dmitry <at> gutov.dev, joaotavora <at> gmail.com, 74561 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#74561: [PATCH] Allow limiting the size of *Completions*
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:10:21 +0200

> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
> Cc: sbaugh <at> catern.com,  juri <at> linkov.net,  dmitry <at> gutov.dev,
>    joaotavora <at> gmail.com,  74561 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:44:46 -0500
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Cc: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>,
> >>  dmitry <at> gutov.dev, 74561 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> >>  Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, juri <at> linkov.net
> >> From: sbaugh <at> catern.com
> >> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:03:31 +0000 (UTC)
> >> 
> >> +(defcustom completions-insert-lazily 200
> >> +  "If non-nil, completions are inserted lazily.
> >
> > Does the default value mean a change in user-facing behavior of
> > completion commands?
> 
> Nope, no user-facing behavior changes.

The NEWS entry seems to imply that the behavior did change.  So either
the NEWS entry needs to be augmented, or there's some misunderstanding
between us regarding what "behavior change" means.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.