GNU bug report logs - #74542
[PATCH 00/11] Improved tooling for package updates

Previous Next

Full log

Message #188 received at 74542 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>,
 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, 74542 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: Re: [bug#74542] [PATCH v2 05/16] packages: Factorize
 ‘all-packages’.
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 17:37:05 +0100

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:

>> @@ -253,6 +254,23 @@ (define* (fold-packages proc init
>>                                  init
>>                                  modules))
>>  
>> +(define all-packages
>> +  (mlambda ()
>> +    "Return the list of all public packages, including replacements and hidden
>> +packages, excluding superseded packages."
>
> Reading the above doc made me question; are replacements always supposed
> to be made public?  I typically would leave them private to avoid
> cluttering the CLI with duplicate packages.

Replacements are always reachable via the ‘replacement’ field, whether
they’re public or not.

If they’re public, they’re also visible from the user interface, which
is probably nicer.  Other than that, it doesn’t make a big difference.

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.