From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:08:30 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#74536 <74536@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#74536 <74536@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces Reply-To: bug#74536 <74536@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:08:30 +0000 retitle 74536 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces reassign 74536 emacs submitter 74536 Al Haji-Ali severity 74536 normal tag 74536 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 14:34:56 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 19:34:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40914 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFerH-0000Dl-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:34:55 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFerG-0000Dd-6i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:34:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tFerF-0007PN-6j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:34:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tFerD-00013o-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:34:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3824038142aso3170190f8f.2 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:34:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1732563288; x=1733168088; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=94R8XnMY7tYTsxqxNTChrC2YxPoFg4hVnaJcn4S8Q7Y=; b=QPC4B+uhEoQOtM3g/9J4CNRCKeEP+Qm9h4J0It/0fdPEHmH/Rb7d41Ot3eJcP+ANo3 /sjMQTRCThhjS308wyLYLO7Gd7AiOKNb0fgs9Q/yvsclK+Zpnn99llReH3xEBMVZEuao 43nvCJHI7mY6Hu2wTwqUhUXS0B7ZeXdNBBX1oMQ/z3hMqQIxJGklU/Hbo0aRNKeKVgWT Bm8n9fgL0HTCviDnumo5/VDy96LCT1eozatlfP9k00qvSS6o9JmdmrkkTFQduB5SYia7 eH47JWlCZ4w6KtpDE3dMbNeVERoZJvv9KoOnlLjUT5EykXhWJs6YvEECvbAnTnQlXIGh pTfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732563288; x=1733168088; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=94R8XnMY7tYTsxqxNTChrC2YxPoFg4hVnaJcn4S8Q7Y=; b=IYjLG1fedbkm+viurfAzzVZ4uWhGNR83S9m4mBwNjLGI1V+CIaWQl7RcXBLsayG+jm 4AOfnnsUgEG9kkLXh4nzhqqSg4BkisSpcB39f75lC1pLnDnQuxaqEManAFCPzQndyvpU K1pLZoxSJUXqXW5WJ4FTwVlvaPlPbgsyFyLHWSk2TTXvcOjEQV4SXgPvfw6gGxQuYXzl MhlLe4iiGVZuXcOjGWxIGTxhAn1l9xLh4K1oQ53XZZ22IyAHUFtZYhDAIhWecQVy0UP0 /Vt0Qe0C0vqsYa96IjTkgVrW0HXvjC1NbASAXsTUW44/mOCu/xXuJ/O80I4n7mkvw6hF fO0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YweihVPzL8xIUCTd60tRd3INQX7aNJb2p7jbz6e9LV+1En3LLl7 3YuYpKpnFIZdQZDNwu/O8c9m6PwIUMlECDROx+h6HyZWuqXOkt6UqenK5A== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctvppdD5hivEbbxN07UYpYttswEPXHEKNF353N8tFxYTdc/Sil2MMAIXNkz0Ni oU3gjNuAbb2cXX9THumW0J0JDKa+198JXfVJ/lgPWSyffmFTk7tvzplcQLFy8omDKjYr3PH+rDE 9LJg9ZyuCBgozImD3l7MQCgRmObHpNiAmJ0DFHA3fy8kCGrMIDm/rKyjDsxzvvN/8/W8hjlp+AP A6h8WZru+mSCltgff5/gvSxgsL/2yZPDb7j31mAsyJwbVrVOQUEorFkfxUOHuid8dZqSP5MAAFb m6PdLoRGae9o3KYNiNPfzIgeXGk8x+koMlHm+SBLO3U518Gvcg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG+EZLeLmn3pA4SkPYD6YBDzfVc1wvjXd5Cqj5zUMK2752RoEshm0kWHwYBwZdhLTBWhAx1Kg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:178a:b0:37c:d11f:c591 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38260b5ba0amr8895700f8f.17.1732563288334; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (sgyl-45-b2-v4wan-166941-cust3717.vm6.cable.virginm.net. [82.37.190.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3825fbee043sm11271517f8f.104.2024.11.25.11.34.46 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:34:47 -0800 (PST) From: Al Haji-Ali To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:34:41 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42a; envelope-from=abdo.haji.ali@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) The output of the following code is --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (progn (fundamental-mode) (insert (concat "\n" (propertize "hello" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "red"))) (propertize " again" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "yellow"))) (propertize " other" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "green")))) "\n")) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- |hello again other| where the left border is red and the right one is green and the yellow border is completely hidden. Having negative line-width produces the same output. It seems that one cannot have multiple adjacent borders unless one has some text in between without a border, like this --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (progn (fundamental-mode) (insert (concat "\n" (propertize "hello" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "red"))) " " (propertize " again" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "yellow"))) (propertize " othe " 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "green")))) "\n")) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- produces |hello| | again other| with (red, red, yellow, green) borders. I find this behaviour, if intended, sometimes helpful as it allows one to have a one-sided border. Though it would be helpful if the exact mechanism is documented. In any case, I was also originally expecting, and wanting, an output like this |hello| again | other| with `(red, yellow, green, green)` and no text in between, but it seems there is no way to achieve such output? Is that correct? -- Al From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 14:45:05 2024 Received: (at 74536) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 19:45:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFf16-0000kv-Rz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:45:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36026) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFf14-0000iN-Na; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:45:03 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tFf0z-0002Mt-DV; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:44:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=FRHMVB/OvnXVxRMeVtWOrB2vjAqLsLLFF/KQ9yICVeU=; b=CgMC58m/8gQy ryJnxGRr8V5VxTxHZfkbDeRC+qFLEX/VLXBLbv172d/Z46VTIyZnP7x+BR5Q2vG6vs4eRflVaF2yj k0MsauNzyb/iWFsJndWoAPH+7OxVaZia74f4fgbgZ+OA0tPxFFjvx5F/fefgOUPfm2xYjpsIAjHWo N1SUztyoMEgrK/9x/MSKf+Q5Qn1z9tVeJ5N8QKsHK/xMn98Nq77Lbkh8qa/HLvS6cAvZs3nmP7syO CD+IgF/46MUxFUXya3BkNy2MCLSaE1PtiadkCAmS9tGZJ0mQeKHNsO+dpUmlN7pef6VMiBVqwht/l nZdx1JH4D6vaLgl4zGiT6w==; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:44:51 +0200 Message-Id: <861pyzhzd8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Al Haji-Ali In-Reply-To: (message from Al Haji-Ali on Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:34:41 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#74536: 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74536 Cc: 74536@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 74536 notabug thanks > From: Al Haji-Ali > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:34:41 +0000 > > > The output of the following code is > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (progn > (fundamental-mode) > (insert (concat "\n" > (propertize "hello" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "red"))) > (propertize " again" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "yellow"))) > (propertize " other" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "green")))) > "\n")) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > |hello again other| > > where the left border is red and the right one is green and the yellow border is completely hidden. Having negative line-width produces the same output. As expected. > It seems that one cannot have multiple adjacent borders unless one has some text in between without a border, like this > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (progn > (fundamental-mode) > (insert (concat "\n" > (propertize "hello" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "red"))) > " " > (propertize " again" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "yellow"))) > (propertize " othe " 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "green")))) > "\n")) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > produces > > |hello| | again other| > > with (red, red, yellow, green) borders. Yes. Basically, Emacs doesn't examine box face changes unless it changes from box to no-box or vice versa. > I find this behaviour, if intended, sometimes helpful as it allows one to have a one-sided border. Though it would be helpful if the exact mechanism is documented. What mechanism would you like to be documented? > In any case, I was also originally expecting, and wanting, an output like this > |hello| again | other| > > with `(red, yellow, green, green)` and no text in between, but it seems there is no way to achieve such output? Is that correct? Yes. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 16:18:40 2024 Received: (at 74536) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2024 21:18:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFgTg-0005GB-5M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:18:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com ([209.85.128.44]:45195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tFgTe-0005Fv-2z for 74536@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:18:38 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43497839b80so17661365e9.2 for <74536@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:18:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1732569452; x=1733174252; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AQQzTz/99L6XuFUJ9HGpNMurGtebxRCcWUpMgQQ1lrc=; b=OftBjR0vhWi0JynJhXnSenBnDXGLC7/mKeiT7lZ6ZTxW3xhf7+OkSb1lVDvkXL9FKG 26Ef5thzoqlxe0YnL+ZPUYEH8aBNkCkvajJANrlvtwSv3a/0GexxcuhNlY3HGWnHg4OR Pdd3EkU1v/799+ilDkb3Jh0vr4BMMUYs+AukBBzHPt5Y0kY3rWEDKGfxrmuF7V9YmD+T G609n4rkt8gW5cSXT2sU++wJ9fb5L/znBDQX1df+fCrFELwf5xqGbARcqB9HJ6o4/Cz5 QPmmcgFDqOINPvWO7d+pmNakEPnRL5WzUJebdJW9wjf2B4Vct8DSaKHkkncm4aDLhgC6 umyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732569452; x=1733174252; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AQQzTz/99L6XuFUJ9HGpNMurGtebxRCcWUpMgQQ1lrc=; b=cjziMpY+KrFzCSoKBC1oc+EWOANFcnIbc5uMlej3GmmnZL/05JwKnxhkdxIFUPEFEK FGKKb8lVH2N3lfgcIxIHgJQYpUPu7r8jWFphK12sKyRRmKErP2KvYwj1/LVLZfUU28r+ sSb7jV4IkFsGMpIfixv1g5zcf9nL8fqSjWw0udknHEAlfIMuf+efNYd9oID2qNW3Ilz5 +Fv1nSj9L9DrXAQESL4nOVIVpGrg7lQGqLmAdP2aMVBxyn0R64dwszLetB5WYV1gXkFq +IUzBK5k/5UUJinAdFCRyVyObMQaBQ9eBs1Bt1PVFmpf4MAz+Ll4uwLUYBblR1o2Qw78 hKew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzrBMi4GGhSBzeURJRKhLGqMaziZbI52etdaywnKw7RW1sGZ669 mauKxznSvLA5e1dkcAB8jBCFArVktc84RP9KaGrVd48uQ42Ll/1V X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsFJ2vNdHrphodzSVACRA6Ed+NbmGpWBly/AR4ZE/BcbPeUBJV8tjKm4dLq4xi f/LfTSjisn/FX37gXW6ZzLzCK+yZpT7HHn2xEfR86tNSVdoUn4uRVeJdBLDMV41luv/qmIowUbU yIfGB++5wXgtYTQ+276OePMvZxmq3CcNNkstbtwRWu2BDlenfFfxpk8f9JZ2wPWQXVhUfrBfoel vOlzsG1fIYBHypK97OoTj/sAjCH7AjK52dUBugxIMCEyAFtPyUF5yY1PtFa0172WQOib027Bycf 0HqQeBp3/mTcM4HC68O/xRoY6QfQqq9IqI8ClwQB5SSOb61inQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFy+VetPlJ7Dg0NyydA/LSQhGWmMxNTGHVB0txQ7q49JYVAq1DQI8mKfnIKt7IdYGcrZyjo8A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d1e:b0:434:a1d3:a30f with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-434a1d3a4ecmr25630135e9.6.1732569451810; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (sgyl-45-b2-v4wan-166941-cust3717.vm6.cable.virginm.net. [82.37.190.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3825fbed9a8sm11404436f8f.92.2024.11.25.13.17.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:17:31 -0800 (PST) From: Al Haji-Ali To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#74536: 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces In-Reply-To: <861pyzhzd8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <861pyzhzd8.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:08:48 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74536 Cc: 74536@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Thanks for the response. On 25/11/2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I find this behaviour, if intended, sometimes helpful as it allows one to have a one-sided border. Though it would be helpful if the exact mechanism is documented. > > What mechanism would you like to be documented? > Exactly what you explained: > Yes. Basically, Emacs doesn't examine box face changes unless it > changes from box to no-box or vice versa. -- Al From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 30 05:45:09 2024 Received: (at 74536-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2024 10:45:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45627 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tHKyK-00016r-Q1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 05:45:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40656) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tHKyJ-000125-6n for 74536-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 05:45:07 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHKyD-0007ks-Nw; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 05:45:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=RUrklo2yG84Nnb+6S2FU7Fp/FxwTTXoMNBuci4iY8/k=; b=sZyiBWJokxmB n/ER4oudwfWq2M1lGagFHKNLolrYr1Yg+iu6znt9Dvq1ZsMB7nW8KQ833lNAm4a++IyyygCN+u3be gppecnkP+LPDSyeCaZsZDBVUkBzB4XUgkMlue3zbktGbvWEmnCVXNsZW7EnJ/KCr7RcHZtYNAFTZC qj5blzdMrYnbdIkLUE5f4mQAd4VWM+js39WDaoCmtk2c4F4o2CaNpxNwXhCpJBJUbehwyot6blI2e 24bSIVO2ieC/DZVQkb7C2Y2jM+QyF2QiGjK1Hd1/J7HxCck8avT7HGGoHGBmRni4tFxuPmPqMIcD9 n0D2CRcIFSEPeK1/Y1hrvw==; Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 12:44:56 +0200 Message-Id: <867c8l80gn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Al Haji-Ali In-Reply-To: (message from Al Haji-Ali on Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:08:48 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#74536: 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces References: <861pyzhzd8.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74536-done Cc: 74536-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Al Haji-Ali > Cc: 74536@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:08:48 +0000 > > > Thanks for the response. > > On 25/11/2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> I find this behaviour, if intended, sometimes helpful as it allows one to have a one-sided border. Though it would be helpful if the exact mechanism is documented. > > > > What mechanism would you like to be documented? > > > > Exactly what you explained: Done. From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:08:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator