GNU bug report logs - #74459
[PATCH 0/8] Linter improvements (eliminate false positives)

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel <at> erlikon.ch>

Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:41:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel <at> erlikon.ch>
Subject: bug#74459: closed (Re: [bug#74459] comments)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:08:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#74459: [PATCH 0/8] Linter improvements (eliminate false positives)

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 74459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
74459: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74459
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel <at> erlikon.ch>
Cc: 74459-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#74459] comments
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:07:41 +0100
Hi,

Gabriel Wicki <gabriel <at> erlikon.ch> skribis:

> Thanks for your review, Ludo'!  I've addressed your concern and came up
> with an even more readable solution -- I hope you agree.

Yes, that’s nice.  Applied, thanks!

I removed “guix:” from commit subject lines and also followed up with a
commit that pre-compiles the regexp instead of recompiling it every time
via ‘string-match’ (it can make a difference when linting a large number
of packages as is the case in the Data Service for example).

Thanks!

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel <at> erlikon.ch>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] Linter improvements (eliminate false positives)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:40:40 +0100
Hi there!

In my recent venture where i linted each and every packages' description and synopsis, I found quite a bunch of false positives.  These usually don't hurt when we lint single packages, but are quite annoying when linting all of them.  Hence I summed my findings up in some code improvements.

Have a nice week!

gabber

Gabriel Wicki (8):
  guix: lint: Fix indentation.
  guix: lint: Refine description start check logic.
  guix: lint: Allow texinfo markup at beginning of description.
  guix: lint: Allow texinfo markup at beginning of synopsis.
  guix: lint: Prevent false positives in description typo check.
  guix: lint: Ignore initials from double space check.
  guix: lint: More abbreviations.
  gnu: Move depending packages next to each other.

 gnu/packages/cpp.scm | 50 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 guix/lint.scm        | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 tests/lint.scm       | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)


base-commit: 33665c52c4670bc3b4d337c89ac9cc6c4c69b26f
-- 
2.46.0




This bug report was last modified 164 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.