GNU bug report logs - #74323
[PATCH rust-team] add rust-rustc-hash-2

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Rick Huijzer <ikbenrickhuyzer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:39:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Rick Huijzer <ikbenrickhuyzer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#74323: closed (Re: [PATCH rust-team] add rust-rustc-hash-2)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:34:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#74323: [PATCH rust-team] add rust-rustc-hash-2

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 74323 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
74323: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74323
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Rick Huijzer <ikbenrickhuyzer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 74323-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rust-team] add rust-rustc-hash-2
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:32:05 +0200
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Thanks. I tweaked the patch slightly so rust-rustc-hash-1 inherited from
rust-rustc-hash-2 and pushed it to the rust-team branch.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Rick Huijzer <ikbenrickhuyzer <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: efraim <at> flashner.co.il, Rick Huijzer <ikbenrickhuyzer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH rust-team] add rust-rustc-hash-2
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:34:50 +0100
---

I need a newer version of rustc-hash because I want to upgrade
tree-sitter because I want to upgrade neovim (and so on) 

Is it acceptable this way? 

 gnu/packages/crates-io.scm | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm b/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm
index e70fb90401..899f557f57 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/crates-io.scm
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2024 Aaron Covrig <aaron.covrig.us <at> ieee.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2024 Nguyễn Gia Phong <mcsinyx <at> disroot.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2024 Jordan Moore <lockbox <at> struct.foo>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -67554,6 +67555,27 @@ (define-public rust-rustc-hash-1
      "This package provides a speedy, non-cryptographic hash used in rustc.")
     (license (list license:asl2.0 license:expat))))
 
+(define-public rust-rustc-hash-2
+  (package
+    (name "rust-rustc-hash")
+    (version "2.0.0")
+    (source
+      (origin
+        (method url-fetch)
+        (uri (crate-uri "rustc-hash" version))
+        (file-name
+          (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
+        (sha256
+          (base32
+            "0lni0lf846bzrf3jvci6jaf4142n1mdqxvcpczk5ch9pfgyk8c2q"))))
+    (build-system cargo-build-system)
+    (arguments `(#:skip-build? #t))
+    (home-page "https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-hash")
+    (synopsis "Speedy, non-cryptographic hash used in rustc")
+    (description
+     "This package provides a speedy, non-cryptographic hash used in rustc.")
+    (license (list license:asl2.0 license:expat))))
+
 (define-public rust-rustc-hex-2
   (package
     (name "rust-rustc-hex")

base-commit: e3b52240386ce8000494e46981abfd07a03c53b4
-- 
2.46.0




This bug report was last modified 278 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.