GNU bug report logs -
#74225
[PATCH] lint: Check for more types of custom 'check phases.
Previous Next
Reported by: Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:05:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi Simon,
On 16.11.24 09:07, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 06 Nov 2024 at 10:46, Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/guix/lint.scm b/guix/lint.scm
>> index 8c6c20c723..4ba728da33 100644
>> --- a/guix/lint.scm
>> +++ b/guix/lint.scm
>> @@ -1433,6 +1433,10 @@ (define (check-optional-tests package)
>> (match delta
>> (`(replace 'check ,expression)
>> (check-check-procedure expression))
>> + (`(add-after ,_ 'check ,expression)
>> + (check-check-procedure expression))
>> + (`(add-before ,_ 'check ,expression)
>> + (check-check-procedure expression))
>
> Please note that 'check here is up to packagers. They might pick the
> symbol 'tests or 'run-check or 'adjusted-tests or 'custom-tests or
> whatever else. To my knowledge, there is no real convention.
>
Of course this is not perfect because the name of the phase to run the
tests is arbitrary but this (simple) change catches this problem in 38
packages currently in guix (and 'check seems to be convention in guix)
This came out of a frustration with failing tests in u-boot-tools which
implements a custom 'check phase after 'install which before
e6ec657c497cdfe9130b7bf5bdfb717a823bf02b were unskipable but passed the
lint check.
> Well, I do not know.
>
> Cheers,
> simon
Dariqq
This bug report was last modified 212 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.