GNU bug report logs - #74145
31.0.50; Default lexical-binding to t

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:59:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 31.0.50

Full log


Message #111 received at 74145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 74145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#74145: 31.0.50; Default lexical-binding to t
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:44:11 +0200
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: stefankangas <at> gmail.com,  74145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:30:36 -0500
> 
> >> >> Pushed to `master`.
> >> > Boom!  Just like that.
> >> Well, yes.  It's harmless.
> > Maybe so, but I think we should have explained why we disregarded
> > objections and suggestions for slower movement forward.
> 
> Which objections are you referring to?

I said "objections and suggestions".  I meant these:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2025-01/msg00531.html

  https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74145#36
  https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74145#57
  https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74145#60

It's okay to note those and decide to go ahead anyway, but I think we
should at least offer the courtesy of explaining why we did so.  The
people who wrote those messages are active participants in Emacs
development, so IMNSHO they deserve to have such an explanation.




This bug report was last modified 68 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.