GNU bug report logs - #74123
Add more fields to AppStream metadata

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74123: closed (Add more fields to AppStream metadata)
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:04:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2024 12:03:48 +0200
with message-id <86r07kn2pn.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#74123: Add more fields to AppStream metadata
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #74123,
regarding Add more fields to AppStream metadata
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
74123: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74123
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Add more fields to AppStream metadata
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:22:10 +0000 (GMT)

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Attached is a patch to add more data to emacs.metainfo.xml, based on the specification at https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html#spec-component-filespec

-- 
Peter Oliver

[0001-Add-more-fields-to-AppStream-metadata.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk>
Cc: 74123-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#74123: Add more fields to AppStream metadata
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 12:03:48 +0200

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 06:21:09 -0700
> Cc: 74123 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver <at> mavit.org.uk> writes:
> 
> > Here are a few other possible combinations taken from the website.  I have attached an image demonstrating them behind the Emacs icon.
> >
> >   <branding>
> >     <color type="primary" scheme_preference="light">#7f5ab6</color>
> >     <color type="primary" scheme_preference="dark">#624195</color>
> >   </branding>
> 
> I guess this is the top one in your screenshot?
> 
> This color scheme looks fine to me, FWIW.

Thanks, installed the patch with the above added (on the master
branch), and closing this bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.