GNU bug report logs - #74078
[PATCH] gnu: Add dart

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Jørgen Kvalsvik <j <at> lambda.is>

Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 03:56:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #28 received at 74078 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>,
 GNU Guix maintainers <guix-maintainers <at> gnu.org>,
 zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>,
 74078 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dart
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 22:03:41 +0900
Hi Tobias,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> writes:

> On 10 November 2024 17:47:59 UTC, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
>>We could keep the sky from falling by documenting that once a known bootstrap path exists, it *must* be used.
>
> As well as mandating the oldest (which is almost certainly the
> smallest) known binary seed.  And we must count it as such.
>
> Granted, it'll ruin our ‘binary seed reduced by N MiB!’ blog posts in
> exchange for a larger/more modern package collection.

I'm pretty sure we already have some binary bootstrapped compilers.
Your suggestions toward documenting a policy make a lot of sense to me;
if you have the bandwidth, I'd like to see it drafted, perhaps as an RFC?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




This bug report was last modified 190 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.