GNU bug report logs - #74027
[PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the beginning of a message

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74027: closed ([PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the
 beginning of a message)
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:31:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:30:40 +0000
with message-id <87iksxofgv.fsf <at> posteo.net>
and subject line Re: bug#74027: [PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the beginning of a message
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #74027,
regarding [PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the beginning of a message
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
74027: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74027
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the beginning of a message
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:41:49 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

It appears "vc-steal-lock" is not compatible with automatic signatures,
as the "I stole the lock on ..." is inserted at the end of the message,
which can appear behind the signature.  This should fix it:

[0001-Insert--Stealing-lock--at-the-beginning-of-a-mes.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (text/plain, inline)]

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on siskin

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 74027-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#74027: [PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the beginning of
 a message
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:30:40 +0000

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
>> Cc: 74027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:10:22 +0000
>> 
>> >> In that case it seems better/simpler to just use 'message-goto-body'.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure.  I use sendmail, and I don't really like the idea of
>> > having message.el loaded into my sessions.
>> >
>> > It shouldn't be hard to dispatch, is it?
>> 
>> Technically no, just if we want to be exhaustive then I don't have a
>> good overview of all clients.  Or should we just fall-back onto message:
>
> Yes, falling back to message should be okay, IMO.
>
> Thanks.

OK, I have pushed the change to master!  Closing the report.

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on siskin

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.