GNU bug report logs - #74027
[PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the beginning of a message

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 74027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74027: [PATCH] ; Insert "Stealing lock" at the beginning of a message
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:50:02 +0200

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: 74027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 15:26:40 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
> >> Cc: 74027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 14:15:53 +0000
> >> 
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> >> -    (goto-char (point-max))
> >> >> +    (mail-text)
> >> >
> >> > I guess you are using sendmail.el as your mail-user-agent?  But the
> >> > default is message.el, so I think we should either use
> >> > message-goto-body here, 
> >> 
> >> Ok, I falsely assumed that using 'mail-text' would be more compatible.
> >> 
> >> >                         
> >> >                         or perhaps dispatch to either to message.el or
> >> > sendmail.el based on the value of mail-user-agent.
> >> 
> >> So a `cond' expression checking mail-user-agent and then invoking the
> >> right function, or is there some more generic way to do that?
> >
> > The former, I think.
> 
> In that case it seems better/simpler to just use 'message-goto-body'.

I'm not sure.  I use sendmail, and I don't really like the idea of
having message.el loaded into my sessions.

It shouldn't be hard to dispatch, is it?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.