GNU bug report logs -
#73932
[PATCH] Add noconfirm to 'package-autoremove'
Previous Next
Reported by: Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:00:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#73932: [PATCH] Add noconfirm to 'package-autoremove'
which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 73932 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
73932: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=73932
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
> Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org> writes:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>> On Nov 5, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>>> On Oct 28, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 27, 2024, at 5:53 AM, Stefan Kangas
>>>>> <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the variation interesting, where NOCONFIRM is a predicate so that
>>>>>> we can selectively remove packages?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have a use case in mind?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, that might make sense. If we do that, should we do the
>>>>>> same in package-install-selected-packages? It uses its NOCONFIRM
>>>>>> argument in a similar way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can do that in a subsequent patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to post such a patch, indeed. Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Here’s two patches:
>>>>
>>>> <0001-Add-noconfirm-to-package-autoremove.patch><0002-Use-prefix-argument-in-package-install-selected-pack.patch>
>>>>
>>>> The first is the same as before, but it adds the prefix argument
>>>> usage Eli suggested.
>>>>
>>>> The second patch adds a matching prefix argument to
>>>> package-install-selected-packages (if this is desired).
>>>>
>>>> I didn’t implement a predicate option for NOCONFIRM yet, since I
>>>> couldn’t think of a use case, and the intended semantics are not
>>>> quite clear to me.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know what else is needed, and thanks!
>>>
>>> Are there any outstanding issues? If so, how can I help resolve them?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>
>> Just checking in again. Is there anything I can do to help resolve this?
>
> Sorry for the delay, I can apply it to master if nobody objects.
I've pushed the changes, and will close this report. Thanks!
>> Thanks!
>>
--
Philip Kaludercic on siskin
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi folks,
Attached is a patch adding an optional NOCONFIRM argument to package-autoremove to skip user confirmation before removing packages.
I want to call package-autoremove in my init file to ensure there are no packages installed except those I configured explicitly via package-selected-packages.
For example, in one session I might install package XYZ interactively via the package menu to try it out. If I decide I like it, I’ll add it to package-selected-packages in my init file to keep it around. Otherwise, I want to make sure it gets blown away the next time I start Emacs.
This workflow is cumbersome in the current implementation of package-autoremove, which prompts the user before removing any packages. This patch adds an optional NOCONFIRM argument similar to what is implemented in package-install-selected-packages.
Please let me know if any changes are needed.
Thanks!
[0001-Add-noconfirm-to-package-autoremove.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 182 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.