GNU bug report logs - #73932
[PATCH] Add noconfirm to 'package-autoremove'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org>

Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:00:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 73932 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#73932: [PATCH] Add noconfirm to 'package-autoremove'
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:36:32 +0000
Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org> writes:

> Hi folks,
>
>> On Nov 5, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>>> On Oct 28, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Sean Devlin <spd <at> toadstyle.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi folks,
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 27, 2024, at 5:53 AM, Stefan Kangas
>>>> <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
>>>> 
>>>>> Is the variation interesting, where NOCONFIRM is a predicate so that
>>>>> we can selectively remove packages?
>>>> 
>>>> Do you have a use case in mind?
>>>> 
>>>>>> Sure, that might make sense. If we do that, should we do the
>>>>> same in package-install-selected-packages? It uses its NOCONFIRM
>>>>> argument in a similar way.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We can do that in a subsequent patch.
>>>> 
>>>> Feel free to post such a patch, indeed.  Thanks in advance.
>>> 
>>> Here’s two patches:
>>> 
>>> <0001-Add-noconfirm-to-package-autoremove.patch><0002-Use-prefix-argument-in-package-install-selected-pack.patch>
>>> 
>>> The first is the same as before, but it adds the prefix argument
>>> usage Eli suggested.
>>> 
>>> The second patch adds a matching prefix argument to
>>> package-install-selected-packages (if this is desired).
>>> 
>>> I didn’t implement a predicate option for NOCONFIRM yet, since I
>>> couldn’t think of a use case, and the intended semantics are not
>>> quite clear to me.
>>> 
>>> Please let me know what else is needed, and thanks!
>> 
>> Are there any outstanding issues? If so, how can I help resolve them?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> Just checking in again. Is there anything I can do to help resolve this?

Sorry for the delay, I can apply it to master if nobody objects.

> Thanks!
>

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on siskin




This bug report was last modified 182 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.