From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 13 17:51:11 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2010 22:51:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHOwA-0006Yz-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:51:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHOw9-0006Ys-4c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:51:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHP0q-0007sx-JO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:56:01 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:52658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHP0q-0007ss-Fw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:56:00 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47008 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHP0p-0006vB-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:56:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHP0l-0007qd-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:55:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:37297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHP0l-0007qZ-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:55:55 -0500 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so2440880ewy.0 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:55:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=YkSTo9Br6R++jIDL26FanJWrKlz+fQV7+RP3KDlUVKk=; b=md1Zlo87vvOzXW7wFDCxPDwOHPIxOawYyX+VpuozmQtgFfGiPDzH3AV3BUnprYq1uE A2mGHAKs3q8z/pji/IZ/KI21aBxwBs6qhxQtt+o3blkAwnw7hRbMBfuBB8aVXmSoj6vi ETkZfbL1cAZe2ZsqaMFy4+fTpoA+lOOZwaCVc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=GKR8XVJ3811U4yGqFY4byGq7t6QHtp3nK228BZlZd1wDl4Vw6DvJfRYHqR8KdIWfV1 L/GY5wa4EHP/drx3LvWvka3+220yJWggIVTBg9QBVr7ARD6cnWhC2mONcgbZYbIxdBES 1/SU7mfHtUVyxeagTVL+shaYJ95kyd7/j6FQ4= Received: by 10.213.34.20 with SMTP id j20mr3481982ebd.71.1289688954846; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:55:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.22.135 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:55:34 -0800 (PST) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:55:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Please linkify the edebug backtrace To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) The edebug backtrace which you get by hitting "d" in edebug is not "linkified" as a normal backtrace. Should it not be that? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 13 20:11:45 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2010 01:11:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHR8C-0007UD-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:11:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHR8B-0007U7-Bi for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:11:43 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60579) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHRCs-0003WK-MW; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:16:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19679.14450.496454.934643@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:16:34 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: merge 1428 7393 X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: green X-Ran: @hOy-6w\E:B^_{-3@5xf7d&fB:UT5[imix2i\Yp.AwA-}vVrh$LD@CVe:LLuC-Z4b{\ X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) forcemerge 1428 7393 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 03 14:36:35 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2018 18:36:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flewF-000414-3w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 14:36:35 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:44840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flewD-00040t-IU; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 14:36:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=+cvhl+YJGGoOpjCMxazF4TbVLEvKEsjhLoK/RPwgJ9Q=; b=FUm3gTNa3B9cmsAayUuTc3L3Zj ignmEb5ULlJdxloAQLRCi9+e7bGpAA97bYe5CD3V6ZXJec5INsNHUKz2EhMQNUeBfS6/nMH5KMKbG yGcMWLBQou/p+teG7pCq9Odan6xHUrsUQDXic2GUpljyg/SIF7BqHAAizrklFP8xQ0iMNX5axS0m6 wlfw7OHVtIVBlgeaWfJx3hfoFFh6GpGUOjqxVgKuP+UTAFf8f17w9rM48UnxDnRVvtt86wbtEvnZz OwoAAR/25OUYsKg5ns4rnWZyyXJh32lAcAxsIxvCCkJag6sYwsGwBI0bdsd9qZdFYmsD3Za5Ni/jB Qa8+UXoA==; Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flewA-0005Rq-Tz; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:36:31 +0200 Received: by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1flevz-0003VY-V0; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:36:20 +0200 From: Gemini Lasswell To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#1428: backtrace from edebug does not have links References: <200811251559.mAPFxWQI016550@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:36:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:44:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87va8rmh5q.fsf@runbox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 1428 fixed close 1428 27.1 thanks Michael Heerdegen writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. > > Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be > rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see > docstring)? [...] Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [91.220.196.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [91.220.196.211 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gazally[at]runbox.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, 1428@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 1428 fixed close 1428 27.1 thanks Michael Heerdegen writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. > > Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be > rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see > docstring)? [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [91.220.196.211 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [91.220.196.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gazally[at]runbox.com) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server tags 1428 fixed close 1428 27.1 thanks Michael Heerdegen writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. > > Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be > rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see > docstring)? I've just pushed to Emacs master that long-anticipated rewrite of edebug-backtrace, which includes making links to functions. Gemini From unknown Fri Sep 05 11:52:37 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator