GNU bug report logs -
#73899
test result: 2 errors, 12 fails
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 73899 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 73899 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73899
; Package
automake
.
(Sun, 20 Oct 2024 03:14:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 20 Oct 2024 03:14:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
automake: 1.17 "make -k check" (-j8) told me to email my test results
here so here they are
gcc: gcc (GCC) 15.0.0 20240509 (experimental)
GNU Make 4.4.1
LFS/GNM
jeff cliff
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End the campaign to Cancel Richard Stallman - go to stallmansupport.org !
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[test-suite.log.gz (application/gzip, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73899
; Package
automake
.
(Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 73899 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Jeff,
automake: 1.17 "make -k check" (-j8) told me to email my test results
here so here they are
Thanks for the report. Looking at the log, the two failures both seem to
relate to the version of autoconf changing during the run, which seems
bizarre. I can't think of anything Automake is doing to make that
happen, though. Maybe something about the LFS build, somehow? Sorry, I'm
at a loss. --thanks, karl.
FAIL: t/java-mix
================
..
+ aclocal-1.17 -Werror
+ autoconf
aclocal.m4:17: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.71.
You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to.
If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.
To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically 'autoreconf'.
..
Information forwarded
to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73899
; Package
automake
.
(Sun, 20 Oct 2024 22:50:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 73899 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
ohhh i think i know what i did then, for some reason i 'make install'
'd *before* doing a 'make check'. that might be why.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 3:35 PM Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> automake: 1.17 "make -k check" (-j8) told me to email my test results
> here so here they are
>
> Thanks for the report. Looking at the log, the two failures both seem to
> relate to the version of autoconf changing during the run, which seems
> bizarre. I can't think of anything Automake is doing to make that
> happen, though. Maybe something about the LFS build, somehow? Sorry, I'm
> at a loss. --thanks, karl.
>
> FAIL: t/java-mix
> ================
> ..
> + aclocal-1.17 -Werror
> + autoconf
> aclocal.m4:17: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.71.
> You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to.
> If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.
> To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically 'autoreconf'.
> ..
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End the campaign to Cancel Richard Stallman - go to stallmansupport.org !
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information forwarded
to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73899
; Package
automake
.
(Tue, 22 Oct 2024 03:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 73899 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
that wasn't it, and figured it out
there was a bunch of tools that were still at 2.71 (autoconf,
autoreconf, autoupdate, some more) installed in /usr/bin while
/usr/local/bin had updated (2.72) versions
was just ./configure --prefix being defined when I installed the first
time and not the second [ the default for autotools is /usr/local/bin
]
without this being a factor 0 fails 0 errors, sorry for the false alarm :)
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 4:47 PM Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ohhh i think i know what i did then, for some reason i 'make install'
> 'd *before* doing a 'make check'. that might be why.
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 3:35 PM Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > automake: 1.17 "make -k check" (-j8) told me to email my test results
> > here so here they are
> >
> > Thanks for the report. Looking at the log, the two failures both seem to
> > relate to the version of autoconf changing during the run, which seems
> > bizarre. I can't think of anything Automake is doing to make that
> > happen, though. Maybe something about the LFS build, somehow? Sorry, I'm
> > at a loss. --thanks, karl.
> >
> > FAIL: t/java-mix
> > ================
> > ..
> > + aclocal-1.17 -Werror
> > + autoconf
> > aclocal.m4:17: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.71.
> > You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to.
> > If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.
> > To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically 'autoreconf'.
> > ..
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> End the campaign to Cancel Richard Stallman - go to stallmansupport.org !
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End the campaign to Cancel Richard Stallman - go to stallmansupport.org !
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information forwarded
to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73899
; Package
automake
.
(Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 73899 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
without this being a factor 0 fails 0 errors, sorry for the false alarm :)
Thanks Jeff. Those are the kind of problems I like :). Closing ...
Reply sent
to
Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:50:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:24:14 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 212 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.