GNU bug report logs - #73862
[PATCH] Add `header-line-active` and `header-line-inactive` faces.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: trevor.m.murphy <at> gmail.com

Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:58:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #147 received at 73862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen <at> gmail.com>
Cc: trevor.m.murphy <at> gmail.com, yantar92 <at> posteo.net, me <at> eshelyaron.com,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 73862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73862: [PATCH] Add `header-line-active` and
 `header-line-inactive` faces.
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 05:30:31 +0200
> From: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 13:19:32 -0800
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, trevor.m.murphy <at> gmail.com, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 
> 	73862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, yantar92 <at> posteo.net
> 
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 2:20 AM, Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com> wrote:
> 
>  Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes: 
> 
>  Please try the patch below. If it gives good results, please run with it for awhile, and tell if you see
>  anything unusual or unexpected. 
> 
>  Thanks, so far so good.
> 
> Same for me, it's also working so far.
> 
> Are there any tradeoffs with this approach other than additional code complexity? Any performance
> concerns?

I didn't time the code.  It is a bit more expensive, but I don't know
by how much.  Maybe you could see what happens in a session with lots
and lots of faces and report?




This bug report was last modified 214 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.