GNU bug report logs - #73862
[PATCH] Add `header-line-active` and `header-line-inactive` faces.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>
Cc: trevor.m.murphy <at> gmail.com, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, aaronjensen <at> gmail.com, 73862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#73862: [PATCH] Add `header-line-active` and `header-line-inactive` faces.
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:39:19 +0200

> From: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>
> Cc: aaronjensen <at> gmail.com,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
>   trevor.m.murphy <at> gmail.com,  73862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 17:29:04 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>
> >> Cc: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen <at> gmail.com>,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
> >>   trevor.m.murphy <at> gmail.com,  73862 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >> Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 15:11:07 +0100
> >> 
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > We also haven't yet heard from Eshel.
> >> 
> >> I don't have any concrete suggestions at this point.  It's surely a
> >> complicated situation.
> >
> > Did you try the patch I posted, and if you did, did it resolve your
> > original problems?  
> 
> I did now, and it doesn't entirely solve the problem: with this patch,
> after remapping header-line in one buffer, the remapping now works for
> that buffer as expected, but it still also "spreads" to other buffers,
> which is unexpected.

What do you mean by "spreads to other buffers"?  When you remapped
header-line face before this change on master, did it behave
differently, and if so, how?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.