GNU bug report logs - #73853
Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #91 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 73853 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>,
 "Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife
 of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>,
 Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Subject: Re: bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for
 when-let*?
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:28:57 +0100

Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> writes:

> I'm not impatient, other people are. Blaming (for example) Tramp for
> the compilation warnings in master.

If you are not impatient: please explain why you are sure that this will
not pop up in, say 18 months, again.  Or why it is better to handle this
corner issue in 7 steps spread over an quarter of a century.

Sorry for the sarcasm, but I miss the weighing up in what you say.  Only
pointing to annoyances counts but doesn't convince me that one solution
is better than the other.


Michael.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.