GNU bug report logs -
#73813
30.0.91; icomplete-mode keymap unusable in xterm for for/backward completions
Previous Next
Full log
Message #62 received at 73813 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:53:18 +0000, Van Ly <van.ly <at> sdf.org> said:
Van> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:46:36 +0000, Van Ly <van.ly <at> sdf.org> said:
>>
Van> I'd put icomplete-mode and icomplete-vertical-mode in the same category
Van> for binding interop.
>>
>> So that would be this:
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/icomplete.el b/lisp/icomplete.el
>> index 540ed2b5819..05914b24d2c 100644
>> --- a/lisp/icomplete.el
>> +++ b/lisp/icomplete.el
>> @@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ icomplete-minibuffer-map
>> :doc "Keymap used by `icomplete-mode' in the minibuffer."
>> "C-M-i" #'icomplete-force-complete
>> "C-j" #'icomplete-force-complete-and-exit
>> + "C-n" #'icomplete-forward-completions
>> + "C-p" #'icomplete-backward-completions
>> "C-." #'icomplete-forward-completions
>> "C-," #'icomplete-backward-completions
>> "<remap> <minibuffer-complete-and-exit>" #'icomplete-ret)
>>
Van> Yes, please.
João, you used "C-s" and "C-r" when adding `icomplete-fido-mode', and
`icomplete-vertical' mode uses "C-n" and "C-p". My intuition is
failing me as to which would be more consistent (adding both seems
like overkill).
>> I donʼt use icomplete or fido, so I have no real opinion to offer
>> here, except that it would be nice to have bindings that work without
>> having to modify xtermʼs configuration.
Van> I agree.
Robert
--
This bug report was last modified 240 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.