GNU bug report logs -
#73803
[PATCH 0/2] Add "Decision Making" section
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:30:05 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 73803 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 73803 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
ludo <at> gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73803
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:30:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
ludo <at> gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:30:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
As Simon proposed in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72891>, these patches
move the paragraphs about consensus seeking to a section of its own
called “Decision Making”. It also promotes the new “Teams” section.
Thoughts?
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès (2):
doc: Add “Making Decisions” section.
doc: Promote “Teams” section.
doc/contributing.texi | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
base-commit: 6757bfdfc0b22a1e23a3d33566155550182244fc
--
2.46.0
Information forwarded
to
ludo <at> gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73803
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 73803 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Suggested by Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>.
* doc/contributing.texi (Making Decisions): New section, with paragraphs
moved from…
(Commit Access): … here. Cross-reference it.
(Teams): Likewise.
Change-Id: Ib276242e0ec7598a1b60dacdde8647bd3d3b85d3
---
doc/contributing.texi | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
index acdc303be6..cc6e84013a 100644
--- a/doc/contributing.texi
+++ b/doc/contributing.texi
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Contributing
* Coding Style:: Hygiene of the contributor.
* Submitting Patches:: Share your work.
* Tracking Bugs and Changes:: Keeping it all organized.
+* Making Decisions:: Collectively choosing the way forward.
* Commit Access:: Pushing to the official repository.
* Reviewing the Work of Others:: Some guidelines for sharing reviews.
* Updating the Guix Package:: Updating the Guix package definition.
@@ -2233,10 +2234,8 @@ Teams
and review the work of individuals in its scope (@pxref{Reviewing the
Work of Others}); it can make decisions within its scope, in agreement
with other teams whenever there is overlap or a close connection, and in
-accordance with other project rules such as seeking consensus.
-@c TODO: Currently ``consensus-based decision making'' is discussed
-@c under ``Commit Access''. Move that elsewhere and refer to it from
-@c here.
+accordance with other project rules such as seeking consensus
+(@pxref{Making Decisions}).
As an example, the Python team is responsible for core Python packaging
matters; it can decide to upgrade core Python packages in a dedicated
@@ -2706,6 +2705,25 @@ Cuirass Build Notifications
where each RSS entry contains a link to the Cuirass build details page
of the associated build.
+@node Making Decisions
+@section Making Decisions
+
+@cindex decision making
+@cindex consensus seeking
+It is expected from all contributors, and even more so from committers,
+to help build consensus and make decisions based on consensus. By using
+consensus, we are committed to finding solutions that everyone can live
+with. It implies that no decision is made against significant concerns
+and these concerns are actively resolved with proposals that work for
+everyone.
+
+A contributor (who may or may not have commit access) wishing to block
+a proposal bears a special responsibility for finding alternatives,
+proposing ideas/code or explain the rationale for the status quo to
+resolve the deadlock. To learn what consensus decision making means and
+understand its finer details, you are encouraged to read
+@url{https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus}.
+
@node Commit Access
@section Commit Access
@@ -2721,19 +2739,10 @@ Commit Access
thought of as a ``badge of honor'' but rather as a responsibility a
contributor is willing to take to help the project.
-It is expected from all contributors, and even more so from committers,
-to help build consensus and make decisions based on consensus. By using
-consensus, we are committed to finding solutions that everyone can live
-with. It implies that no decision is made against significant concerns
-and these concerns are actively resolved with proposals that work for
-everyone.
-
-A contributor (who may or may not have commit access) wishing to block
-a proposal bears a special responsibility for finding alternatives,
-proposing ideas/code or explain the rationale for the status quo to
-resolve the deadlock. To learn what consensus decision making means and
-understand its finer details, you are encouraged to read
-@url{https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus}.
+Committers are in a position where they enact technical decisions. Such
+decisions must be made by @emph{actively building consensus} among
+interested parties and stakeholders. @ref{Making Decisions}, for more
+on that.
The following sections explain how to get commit access, how to be ready
to push commits, and the policies and community expectations for commits
@@ -3006,6 +3015,8 @@ Reviewing the Work of Others
the project to keep bikes dry.}. As a reviewer, try hard to explain the
rationale for suggestions you make, and to understand and take into
account the submitter's motivation for doing things in a certain way.
+In other words, build consensus with everyone involved (@pxref{Making
+Decisions}).
@end enumerate
@cindex LGTM, Looks Good To Me
--
2.46.0
Information forwarded
to
ludo <at> gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73803
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 73803 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Suggested by Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>.
* doc/contributing.texi (Teams): Move from subsection of “Submitting
Patches” to section of “Contributing”.
Change-Id: Id21be29380fc981e74a5025b1467eebde8566726
---
doc/contributing.texi | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
index cc6e84013a..0385cedfb1 100644
--- a/doc/contributing.texi
+++ b/doc/contributing.texi
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Contributing
* Coding Style:: Hygiene of the contributor.
* Submitting Patches:: Share your work.
* Tracking Bugs and Changes:: Keeping it all organized.
+* Teams:: Coordinating efforts.
* Making Decisions:: Collectively choosing the way forward.
* Commit Access:: Pushing to the official repository.
* Reviewing the Work of Others:: Some guidelines for sharing reviews.
@@ -2055,7 +2056,6 @@ Submitting Patches
@menu
* Configuring Git::
* Sending a Patch Series::
-* Teams::
@end menu
@node Configuring Git
@@ -2223,83 +2223,6 @@ Sending a Patch Series
another cover letter, e.g. for explaining what's changed since the last
revision, and these changes are necessary.
-@node Teams
-@subsection Teams
-@cindex teams
-
-To organize work on Guix, including but not just development efforts,
-the project has a set of @dfn{teams}. Each team has its own focus and
-interests and is the primary contact point for questions and
-contributions in those areas. A team's primary mission is to coordinate
-and review the work of individuals in its scope (@pxref{Reviewing the
-Work of Others}); it can make decisions within its scope, in agreement
-with other teams whenever there is overlap or a close connection, and in
-accordance with other project rules such as seeking consensus
-(@pxref{Making Decisions}).
-
-As an example, the Python team is responsible for core Python packaging
-matters; it can decide to upgrade core Python packages in a dedicated
-@code{python-team} branch, in collaboration with any team whose scope is
-directly dependent on Python---e.g., the Science team---and following
-branching rules (@pxref{Managing Patches and Branches}). The
-Documentation team helps review changes to the documentation and can
-initiate overarching documentation changes. The Translations team
-organizes translation of Guix and its manual and coordinates efforts in
-that area. The Core team is responsible for the development of core
-functionality and interfaces of Guix; because of its central nature,
-some of its work may require soliciting input from the community at
-large and seeking consensus before enacting decisions that would affect
-the entire community.
-
-Teams are defined in the @file{etc/teams.scm} file in the Guix
-repository. The scope of each team is defined, when applicable, as a
-set of files or as a regular expression matching file names.
-
-@cindex team membership
-Anyone with interest in a team's domain and willing to contribute to its
-work can apply to become a member by contacting current members by
-email; commit access is not a precondition. Membership is formalized by
-adding the person's name and email address to @file{etc/teams.scm}.
-Members who have not been participating in the team's work for one year
-or more may be removed; they are free to reapply for membership later.
-
-@cindex team creation
-One or more people may propose the creation of a new team by reaching
-out to the community by email at @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org}, clarifying
-the intended scope and purpose. When consensus is reached on the
-creation of this team, someone with commit access formalizes its
-creation by adding it and its initial members to @file{etc/teams.scm}.
-
-To list existing teams, run the following command from a Guix checkout:
-
-@example
-$ ./etc/teams.scm list-teams
-id: mentors
-name: Mentors
-description: A group of mentors who chaperone contributions by newcomers.
-members:
-+ Charlie Smith <charlie@@example.org>
-@dots{}
-@end example
-
-@cindex mentoring
-You can run the following command to have the Mentors team put in
-CC of a patch series:
-
-@example
-$ git send-email --to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org \
- --header-cmd='etc/teams.scm cc-mentors-header-cmd' *.patch
-@end example
-
-The appropriate team or teams can also be inferred from the modified
-files. For instance, if you want to send the two latest commits of the
-current Git repository to review, you can run:
-
-@example
-$ guix shell -D guix
-[env]$ git send-email --to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org -2
-@end example
-
@node Tracking Bugs and Changes
@section Tracking Bugs and Changes
@@ -2705,6 +2628,83 @@ Cuirass Build Notifications
where each RSS entry contains a link to the Cuirass build details page
of the associated build.
+@node Teams
+@section Teams
+@cindex teams
+
+To organize work on Guix, including but not just development efforts,
+the project has a set of @dfn{teams}. Each team has its own focus and
+interests and is the primary contact point for questions and
+contributions in those areas. A team's primary mission is to coordinate
+and review the work of individuals in its scope (@pxref{Reviewing the
+Work of Others}); it can make decisions within its scope, in agreement
+with other teams whenever there is overlap or a close connection, and in
+accordance with other project rules such as seeking consensus
+(@pxref{Making Decisions}).
+
+As an example, the Python team is responsible for core Python packaging
+matters; it can decide to upgrade core Python packages in a dedicated
+@code{python-team} branch, in collaboration with any team whose scope is
+directly dependent on Python---e.g., the Science team---and following
+branching rules (@pxref{Managing Patches and Branches}). The
+Documentation team helps review changes to the documentation and can
+initiate overarching documentation changes. The Translations team
+organizes translation of Guix and its manual and coordinates efforts in
+that area. The Core team is responsible for the development of core
+functionality and interfaces of Guix; because of its central nature,
+some of its work may require soliciting input from the community at
+large and seeking consensus before enacting decisions that would affect
+the entire community.
+
+Teams are defined in the @file{etc/teams.scm} file in the Guix
+repository. The scope of each team is defined, when applicable, as a
+set of files or as a regular expression matching file names.
+
+@cindex team membership
+Anyone with interest in a team's domain and willing to contribute to its
+work can apply to become a member by contacting current members by
+email; commit access is not a precondition. Membership is formalized by
+adding the person's name and email address to @file{etc/teams.scm}.
+Members who have not been participating in the team's work for one year
+or more may be removed; they are free to reapply for membership later.
+
+@cindex team creation
+One or more people may propose the creation of a new team by reaching
+out to the community by email at @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org}, clarifying
+the intended scope and purpose. When consensus is reached on the
+creation of this team, someone with commit access formalizes its
+creation by adding it and its initial members to @file{etc/teams.scm}.
+
+To list existing teams, run the following command from a Guix checkout:
+
+@example
+$ ./etc/teams.scm list-teams
+id: mentors
+name: Mentors
+description: A group of mentors who chaperone contributions by newcomers.
+members:
++ Charlie Smith <charlie@@example.org>
+@dots{}
+@end example
+
+@cindex mentoring
+You can run the following command to have the Mentors team put in
+CC of a patch series:
+
+@example
+$ git send-email --to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org \
+ --header-cmd='etc/teams.scm cc-mentors-header-cmd' *.patch
+@end example
+
+The appropriate team or teams can also be inferred from the modified
+files. For instance, if you want to send the two latest commits of the
+current Git repository to review, you can run:
+
+@example
+$ guix shell -D guix
+[env]$ git send-email --to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org -2
+@end example
+
@node Making Decisions
@section Making Decisions
--
2.46.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73803
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 73803 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hello,
>
> As Simon proposed in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72891>, these patches
> move the paragraphs about consensus seeking to a section of its own
> called “Decision Making”. It also promotes the new “Teams” section.
>
> Thoughts?
None, other than it LGTM :-).
Reviewed-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail>
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Reply sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 03 Nov 2024 22:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 03 Nov 2024 22:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 73803-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> Hi,
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As Simon proposed in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72891>, these patches
>> move the paragraphs about consensus seeking to a section of its own
>> called “Decision Making”. It also promotes the new “Teams” section.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> None, other than it LGTM :-).
>
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail>
Pushed as cf46aa7192d72a450dc0132c6360ca55595b3139, thanks!
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 02 Dec 2024 12:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 202 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.