GNU bug report logs - #73752
29.4; Ligatures are randomly rendered with extra spaces

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: xuan <at> xlk.me

Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:40:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 54646

Found in versions 29.0.50, 29.4

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #152 received at 73752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Tim Ruffing <dev <at> real-or-random.org>
Cc: 73752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, xuan <at> xlk.me, visuweshm <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#73752: 29.4; Ligatures are randomly rendered with extra spaces
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:57:10 +0200
> From: Tim Ruffing <dev <at> real-or-random.org>
> Cc: 73752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Visuwesh <visuweshm <at> gmail.com>, xuan <at> xlk.me
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:00:17 +0100
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 19:46 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > 
> > Did the "bad" display start from "good" at the beginning of a
> > session? Or did it start from "bad" to begin with?
> 
> I'm rather sure that it started bad from the beginning of the session
> yesterday.
> 
> In general, I'm not so sure, unfortunately. (I had disabled ligatures
> in the past months because this bug was too annoying.) Don't rely on
> any of this: I can't recall that it ever flipped suddenly from good to
> bad *when the affected ligatures was in the visible array of the
> buffer*. But I'm not so sure if this has really never flipped from good
> to bad during a session, when the ligature was not visible.

Then what exactly is the difference between the session with "good"
display and the one with the "bad" display?  How come they show the
same ligature differently?  What did you do to make them have
different looks?




This bug report was last modified 252 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.