GNU bug report logs - #73707
Missing functions for R7RS small

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 73707 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Dash <simonsdash <at> aol.com>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: Missing functions for R7RS small
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:42:01 -0700

Hi,

You don't implement the functions string->vector and vector->string 
which are in R7RS small per the index at scheme.org:

https://index.scheme.org/filterset/r7rs_small/search?query=string-%3Evector

Simon

Message #8 received at 73707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: 73707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Simon Dash <simonsdash <at> aol.com>
Subject: Re: bug#73707: Missing functions for R7RS small
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 23:52:54 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

Simon Dash via "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension
Language" <bug-guile <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> You don't implement the functions string->vector and vector->string which are in
> R7RS small per the index at scheme.org:

Both of them seem to be defined in (scheme base):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (scheme base)
scheme@(guile-user)> string->vector
$1 = #<procedure string->vector (str) | (str start) | (str start end)>
scheme@(guile-user)> vector->string
$2 = #<procedure vector->string (v) | (v start #:optional end)>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Could you please expand on what the problem seems to be?

Have a nice day,
Tomas

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.