GNU bug report logs - #73567
Request for merging "lisp-team" branch

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:44:05 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 73567 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 73567 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73567; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:44:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:44:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:42:41 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi.
The lisp-team branch updates sbcl to 2.4.9.
Please test if you can.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to glv <at> posteo.net, cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com, me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com, sharlatanus <at> gmail.com, jgart <at> dismail.de, guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73567; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:53:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ashish.is <at> lostca.se
To: 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: glv <at> posteo.net, Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl: Update to 2.4.10.
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:50:33 +0100
From: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl): Update to 2.4.10.

Change-Id: I9631a0ddd4fe7f6875f0f52ec8b917c229670256
---
Hi,

SBCL 2.4.10 is released not so long ago, since merge window is still open, why not merge the latest version.

Thanks!


 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 506cd40326..67d194b440 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -1355,14 +1355,14 @@ (define-public s7
 (define-public sbcl
   (package
     (name "sbcl")
-    (version "2.4.9")
+    (version "2.4.10")
     (source
      (origin
        (method url-fetch)
        (uri (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/sbcl/sbcl/" version "/sbcl-"
                            version "-source.tar.bz2"))
        (sha256
-        (base32 "1qh56rgwg3np2cr26kgrrsagrnawkcnzb8bw9p33v56nqpmy8w4r"))
+        (base32 "1y72ql8dxwjkwkikyk26w4n38p6apvv2l7440kp3x4fjd5mkksyf"))
        (modules '((guix build utils)))
        (snippet
         '(begin

base-commit: cc34ba5d474b055333ccb5a0c787fac392f83b1a
-- 
2.47.0





Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73567; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: ashish.is <at> lostca.se
Cc: 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl: Update to 2.4.10.
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:14:22 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
ashish.is <at> lostca.se skribis:

> SBCL 2.4.10 is released not so long ago, since merge window is still open, why not merge the latest version.
>
> Thanks!

Hi.
I had the same idea, but I haven't pushed the update to the lisp-team
branch yet. I'm currently rebuilding things locally with SBCL 2.4.10 to
see if everything still works fine, and then I'll rebase the lisp-team
branch.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73567; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: ashish.is <at> lostca.se
Cc: 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl: Update to 2.4.10.
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:01:46 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> skribis:

> ashish.is <at> lostca.se skribis:
>
>> SBCL 2.4.10 is released not so long ago, since merge window is still open, why not merge the latest version.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Hi.
> I had the same idea, but I haven't pushed the update to the lisp-team
> branch yet. I'm currently rebuilding things locally with SBCL 2.4.10 to
> see if everything still works fine, and then I'll rebase the lisp-team
> branch.

SBCL 2.4.10 is now on the lisp-team branch.
However the CI is having some issues right now, so I don't know when it
will start building substitutes.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73567; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:27:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Ashish SHUKLA" <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
To: "Guillaume Le Vaillant" <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 73567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl: Update to 2.4.10.
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:25:44 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu Oct 31, 2024 at 12:01 PM CET, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> skribis:
>
> > ashish.is <at> lostca.se skribis:
> >
> >> SBCL 2.4.10 is released not so long ago, since merge window is still open, why not merge the latest version.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > Hi.
> > I had the same idea, but I haven't pushed the update to the lisp-team
> > branch yet. I'm currently rebuilding things locally with SBCL 2.4.10 to
> > see if everything still works fine, and then I'll rebase the lisp-team
> > branch.
>
> SBCL 2.4.10 is now on the lisp-team branch.
> However the CI is having some issues right now, so I don't know when it
> will start building substitutes.

Thanks! Looking forward to the update.

-- 
Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116  20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0

"If I destroy you, what business is it of yours ?" (Dark Forest, Liu Cixin)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 73567-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: 73567-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:05 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
lisp-team branch merged into master at
b6b439c24314580f27e14d62022d5a8b2083f757.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 233 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.