GNU bug report logs -
#73494
[PATCH 0/2] tmpfs /run.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On Sat, 03 May 2025 00:17:23 +0800,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > From: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>
> >
> > Use ‘invoke’ for backtraces and avoid changing environment.
> >
> > * gnu/services.scm (activation-script): Execute activation scripts in
> > ‘invoke’.
> > Warn about failed activation scripts.
> >
> > Change-Id: I89be31433fbb46d0c4a9dc6115ab167910840b6f
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > ;; Run the services' activation snippets.
> > - ;; TODO: Use 'load-compiled'.
> > - (for-each primitive-load '#$actions)))))
> > + (for-each (lambda (action)
> > + ;; Don't block activation process when one
> > + ;; action fails.
> > + (catch #t
> > + (lambda ()
> > + (invoke action))
> > + (lambda _
> > + (warning
> > + (G_ "failed to activate '~a'.~%")
> > + action))))
> > + '#$actions)))))
>
> As I suggested upthread (or elsewhere? I’m lost!), I think it would be
> enough to keep loading these files in the main process (as opposed to
> spawning one short-lived process for each activation) and simply catch
> exceptions:
>
> (for-each (lambda (file)
> (guard (c …)
> (save-module-excursion
> …)))
> '#$actions)
>
> I think it would do what we want while avoiding the overhead. I don’t
> think it qualifies as “premature optimization” because it’s already in
> place and the semantics are well-defined.
Implemented in v6.
This bug report was last modified 34 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.