GNU bug report logs -
#73484
31.0.50; Abolishing etags-regen-file-extensions
Previous Next
Full log
Message #62 received at 73484 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 05/10/2024 10:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Like I said: in huge trees this might matter.
We do want to support them, right? Or anyway make the project size
cutoff (where it remains practical to use Emacs) as high as feasible.
> But in any case, I don't understand the significance of the timings
> you show: we are discussing the increase in processing time which will
> be caused by adding files with no tags, which produce a single line in
> TAGS.
If there are a magnitude more "other" files, and an average source file
contains only several definitions, this can make a difference.
> Therefore the interesting figures are time differences in
> processing some commands with and without those additional lines. Are
> the times you show above related to any of that?
The time to generate is relevant. The time to visit the tags table gets
non-trivial too, and it can increase.
>> If someone were to provide a patch for etags with new functionality
>> (disabling fallbacks, at least), I could benchmark and come back with
>> numbers. And if experimental flags are available, with numbers for those
>> as well.
>
> How hard is it to add to a live TAGS file fake lines which look like
> this:
>
> ^L
> foo,0
>
> (with random strings instead of "foo"), and then time some TAGS-using
> commands with and without these additions?
Okay, done that.
'M-.' takes more or less the same.
The file size of TAGS increased from 66 MB to 85 MiB.
Won't measure time to generate now - because the current method and the
"real" one will be different, but note that it's more relevant with
etags-regen-mode because the scan is performed lazily: every time the
user does the first search in a new project.
This bug report was last modified 225 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.