GNU bug report logs - #73439
[PATCH 00/10] Update libreoffice to its latest version.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>

Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>, 73439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#73439] [PATCH 00/10] Update libreoffice to its latest version.
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:35:31 +0200
Am Montag, dem 23.09.2024 um 14:15 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Graves:
> This patch series updates libreoffice to its latest version. I used
> local builds of derivations with ccache
> (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68315) to test developping and updating
> a big package incrementally. Some commits can be squashed, but I
> think we should at least keep separate 24.2.0.3, 24.2.6.2, 24.8.1.2.
> It also adds an updater for the libreoffice package.
Why those steps?  Should we perhaps have multiple packages with some
older versions for the time being?

> Nicolas Graves (10):
>   import: Add %libreoffice-updater.
LGTM
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.0.3.
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.1.2.
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.2.2.
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.3.2.
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.4.2.
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.5.2.
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.2.6.2.
>   gnu: libreoffice: Update to 24.8.1.2.
>   gnu: hunspell-dictionaries: Update to  24.8.1.2.
As noted in the comment hunspell and libreoffice ought to be kept in
sync.  IIUC, this would mean updating hunspell-dictionaries in lockstep
with libreoffice on those intermediate steps as well, no?

Cheers




This bug report was last modified 221 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.