GNU bug report logs - #73431
Add `setf` support for `stream.el` in ELPA

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:35:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #26 received at 73431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>, Nicolas Petton <nicolas <at> petton.fr>,
 73431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73431: Add `setf` support for `stream.el` in ELPA
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:11:51 +0000
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>> Sounds like a bug, indeed.  But I'd rather fix it by making it fail
>>> cleanly, to preserve the (current) immutability of streams (at least
>>> until we decide that there's a good reason for streams to be mutable).
>> One exception to the immutability of stream might be buffers?
>
> Sorry, I don't follow.  What do you mean by that?

Using (stream (current-buffer)) i create a stream of things in the
current buffer.  E.g. using

(seq-find
 (lambda (line)
   (and line (string-match-p "seq" line)))
 (stream (current-buffer) nil 'defun))

I can try to find the first top level definition that contains a
substring (the need to check if the value is non-nil is a bit annoying).

Being able to modify the head of a buffer-stream using setf seems like
something that could be useful, and certainly more efficient than what
many people want to do with splitting the return value of
(buffer-string).

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on siskin




This bug report was last modified 264 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.