GNU bug report logs - #73431
Add `setf` support for `stream.el` in ELPA

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>
Subject: bug#73431: closed (Re: bug#73431: Add `setf` support for
 `stream.el` in ELPA)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:18:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#73431: Add `setf` support for `stream.el` in ELPA

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 73431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
73431: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=73431
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>, philipk <at> posteo.net,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, nicolas <at> petton.fr, 73431-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73431: Add `setf` support for `stream.el` in ELPA
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:16:58 -0500

Not sure who should do it, but since noone did it yet, I went ahead and
pushed it to `elpa.git`.  Thanks.


        Stefan


Okamsn [2024-11-08 01:45:47] wrote:

> Michael Heerdegen wrote:
>> Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> For shortening the first line of the documentation of `seq-take-while`,
>>> do you think changing "Return a stream of the successive elements for
>>> which (PRED elt) is non-nil in STREAM" to "Return a stream of serial
>>> elements in STREAM for which PRED returns non-nil" works?
>> 
>> Hmm.  How about
>> 
>> "Return the starting consecutive elements that fulfill PRED."
>> 
>> Or "front elements"?
>> 
>> I tried to emphasize that the function is not about the whole sequence
>> but starts at the front and aborts once PRED is not fulfilled.  We can
>> later say explicitly that the predicate is called like (PRED ELT) - that
>> alone makes the sentence shorter.
>> 
>> But I'm not that good when using English language - better versions
>> welcome.
>> 
>>> Also, do you think that the documentation string for `seq-drop-while`
>>> should also be changed for consistency?
>> 
>> Sure.
>> 
>> 
>> Michael.
>
> Hello,
>
> Attached are patch files which include the requested shorter doc strings 
> for `seq-take-while` and `seq-drop-while`.  The quoting in `seq-mapn` 
> has been fixed. I did not delete any of the doc strings because there 
> does not seem to be consensus on that.
>
> Is there anything else that you would like changed outside of the 
> discussion about the doc strings?
>
> Thank you.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: Nicolas Petton <nicolas <at> petton.fr>
Subject: Add `setf` support for `stream.el` in ELPA
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:33:24 +0000

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

The attached patch adds `setf` support for `stream-first`, 
`stream-rest`, and `seq-elt` for streams. The support for `setf` with 
`seq-elt` for streams uses the added support for `stream-first`, 
following the definition of `seq-elt` for streams.

Would you like anything changed?

Thank you.

[0001-Add-setf-support-to-stream.el.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.