GNU bug report logs -
#73425
31.0.50; Support images in HTML versions of ELPA package manuals
Previous Next
Full log
Message #32 received at 73425 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
>> Cc: me <at> eshelyaron.com, 73425 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 18:23:38 +0000
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> >> What we need is some kind of an indication in the package specification,
>> >> what files should be copied out for the manual to access, as otherwise
>> >> the images would only be hidden in the package tarball, that a web
>> >> browser cannot access (AFAIK).
>> >
>> > "Copied" where and why? Aren't the HTML docs generated in the
>> > package's tree, like the Info docs?
>>
>> No, these are the files we generate for a package under
>> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages:
>>
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 phi phi 368640 Mar 22 2024 compat-29.1.4.5.tar
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 phi phi 11183 Mar 22 2024 compat.html
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 phi phi 997 Mar 22 2024 compat-readme.txt
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 phi phi 1230 Mar 22 2024 compat.svg
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 phi phi 19 Mar 22 2024 compat.tar -> compat-29.1.4.5.tar
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 phi phi 1016 Mar 22 2024 compat.xml
>
> Then the image files should be in the same directory (or in its
> images/ subdirectory, but that would need to be coordinated with the
> package developers).
Right, and we can facilitate this by allowing package specifications to
annotate where images are found.
> How do we generate these HTML files from the Texinfo sources?
Basically by executing,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
makeinfo --no-split [input-name] -o [output-name] --html --css-ref=[css-url]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> plus the manual under https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/doc/[package name]
>
> So we have the HTML docs in two places? Why two? And why do I see
> both https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/doc/compat.html and
> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/doc/compat/compat.html?
I am not sure, my suspicion is some kind of historical backwards
compatibility. I have CC'ed Stefan who might know more.
> In any case, what I propose is to have the image files right near the
> HTML files which reference them.
That would make sense.
>> >> Do you know if TeXinfo has an option to inline images? If the
>> >> "makeinfo" command could somehow generate data: urls when exporting
>> >> images, then this could be very easily solved.
>> >
>> > This is already supported, for a long time, both in Info and HTML
>> > formats (and in other formats as well; see the node "Image Syntax" in
>> > the Texinfo manual.
>>
>> I did take a look at that node, but I couldn't find anything that would
>> help me.
>
> ??? What are you looking for that is not there?
Some kind of --embed flag, that would inline images. So instead of
generating
<img src="/path/to/image.png" />
makeinfo could produce
<img src="..."
--
Philip Kaludercic on siskin
This bug report was last modified 109 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.