GNU bug report logs -
#7342
face remap per frame, not buffer
Previous Next
Reported by: Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa <at> Freenet.DE>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:07:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: notabug, wontfix
Found in version 24.0.50
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #17 received at 7342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am 07.11.2010 um 00:22 schrieb Drew Adams:
> Yes, they changed the behavior of S-mouse-1. It now does so-called
> text scaling
> or resizing.
I do see that a new font is used each time I increase or decrease the
text font used:
1. with my eyes (there are visible changes in the glyphs used which
cannot come from scaling, particularly not in case of the used Lucida
Sans Typewriter fonts)
2. C-u x = tells me different fonts used
3. lsof reports for for the case a = 224) initial frame, b = 225)
another frame opened, c = 226) text size increased, d = 227) text size
reset to default and then decreased
pete 224 /\ lsof -p 61698 | grep -i fonts | sort
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 4073 18559873 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14793 18559811 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutBS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14816 18559882 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 50776 9399361 /usr/
local/texlive/2008/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/arkandis/libris/
LibrisADFStd-Bold.otf
pete 225 /\ lsof -p 61698 | grep -i fonts | sort
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 4073 18559873 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14793 18559811 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutBS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14816 18559882 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 50776 9399361 /usr/
local/texlive/2008/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/arkandis/libris/
LibrisADFStd-Bold.otf
pete 226 /\ lsof -p 61698 | grep -i fonts | sort
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 4073 18559873 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14793 18559811 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutBS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14816 18559882 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 15072 18559821 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutBS12.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 15220 18559892 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS12.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 50776 9399361 /usr/
local/texlive/2008/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/arkandis/libris/
LibrisADFStd-Bold.otf
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 65932 18561222 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/TTF/Vera.ttf
pete 227 /\ lsof -p 61698 | grep -i fonts | sort
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 3515 18559863 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS08-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 4073 18559873 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 13536 18559801 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutBS08.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14793 18559811 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutBS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 14816 18559882 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS10.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 15072 18559821 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutBS12.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 15220 18559892 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/75dpi/lutRS12.pcf.gz
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 50776 9399361 /usr/
local/texlive/2008/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/arkandis/libris/
LibrisADFStd-Bold.otf
emacs 61698 pete txt REG 14,4 65932 18561222 /usr/X11/
share/fonts/TTF/Vera.ttf
Libris ADF Std is used for the menus from the menu bar, Vera maybe for
pop-ups, and Lucida Sans Typewriter as text font in all buffers. My
version of GNU Emacs 24.0.50 is elder than this month.
The question is anyway: Why are two buffers in two different frames
synchronised in their appearance? Is this really a design goal? And no
bug? I see this behaviour since, say, GNU Emacs 23.0.60.
--
Greetings
Pete
Almost anything is easier to get into than out of.
– Allen's Law
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 211 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.