GNU bug report logs -
#73418
ls (GNU coreutils) 9.4 is extremely slower than ls (GNU coreutils) 8.32 listing files on a cifs mounted share
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 03/10/2024 15:28, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 03/10/2024 07:39, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> On 2024-10-02 15:14, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>>
>>> I notice that tests/ls/getxattr-speedup.sh is failing now,
>>> which I've not looked into yet.
>>
>> I'm not seeing that after the changes I committed this evening. If you
>> can still reproduce it please let us know the details.
>
> I can still repro.
> I'm on BTRFS though I don't think that matters for this test.
> I suspect the caching is being bypassed as we don't return ENOTSUP
> in all cases where the underlying lgetxattr() returns ENOTSUP.
> Actually in cases where the caching in file_has_aclinfo_cache()
> is effective, and file_has_aclinfo() is bypassed, we get UMR
> due to the uninitialized aclinfo struct.
> So the whole interaction with file_has_aclinfo_cache() needs looking at.
I can confirm that the following commit fixes both issues above:
https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/commit/b857d66b5
> I also see issues with symlink handling,
> where security contexts aren't read for symlinks.
> Comparing system ls, with latest:
> $ ls -lZ INSTALL
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 padraig padraig unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 ...
>
> $ src/ls -lZ INSTALL
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 padraig padraig ? ...
This is still an issue here.
thanks,
Pádraig
This bug report was last modified 187 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.