GNU bug report logs -
#73407
31.0.50; Add diff-discard-hunk
Previous Next
Reported by: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 10:20:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 31.0.50
Done: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> Cc: 73407 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:40:30 +0100
>
> +@findex diff-discard-hunk
> +@item C-c C-k
> +Reverse-apply this hunk to the target file, and then kill it
> +(@code{diff-discard-hunk}). Unless the buffer visiting the target file
> +was already modified, save it.
We should come up with a better name for this command.
diff-discard-hunk tells me the command will discard the hunk, but says
nothing about applying it, let alone reverse-applying it. How about
diff-revert-hunk, or maybe diff-revert-and-discard?
> +This command is useful in buffers generated by @w{@kbd{C-x v =}} and
> +@w{@kbd{C-x v D}} (@pxref{Old Revisions}). You can use this command to
> +remove hunks you never intend to commit, such as temporary debug prints,
> +and the like.
This text could also use some clarification: "remove hunks you never
intended to commit" only hints on what it actually does. A better
description would be something like "undo some of the changes you made
that you didn't intend". I wouldn't mention "commit" at all, since
AFAIU this command is not specific to VC and doesn't require a VCS.
> - (message "%d hunks failed; no buffers changed" failures)))))
> + (message "%d hunks failed; no buffers changed" failures)
> + failures))))
This comes from existing text, but still: what does the above say when
there's only 1 failure? does it say "1 hunks failed"? If so, can we
improve the handling of singular/plural here?
Thanks.
This bug report was last modified 240 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.