GNU bug report logs -
#73387
30.0.90; C-x v v in diff-mode doesn't work after C-c C-n
Previous Next
Reported by: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:10:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 30.0.90
Done: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:24:21 +0800
with message-id <87frpffgai.fsf <at> melete.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: bug#73387: 30.0.90; C-x v v in diff-mode doesn't work after C-c C-n
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #73387,
regarding 30.0.90; C-x v v in diff-mode doesn't work after C-c C-n
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
73387: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=73387
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
X-debbugs-cc: monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov <at> yandex.ru, juri <at> linkov.net
Hello,
If you do C-c C-n in a diff-mode buffer with multiple hunks, a
subsequent C-x v v signals a user-error from diff-file-next. I think
that the bug is in how diff-vc-deduce-fileset invokes diff-file-next.
I'm not sure exactly how to rework diff-vc-deduce-fileset.
It would be nice to fix this because then C-c C-n C-x v v would be a
convenient way to commit just a single hunk.
--
Sean Whitton
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
On Tue 01 Oct 2024 at 04:57am +03, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 01/10/2024 04:40, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Is it right that diff-vc-deduce-fileset will only ever be called in the
>> context of using C-x v v to commit a patch? The name of the function
>> suggests that it might be used for something else, if not now then in
>> the future.
>
> It's not a 100% guarantee but for now that's how things stand, and it doesn't
> work in a narrowed buffer. So for simplicity's sake we can make it show an
> error with such instructions, I think.
>
> I don't mind doing it the another way too, but if its return value is not
> used, that's not a very intuitive design.
Okay, done that now, and closing the bug. Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
This bug report was last modified 232 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.