GNU bug report logs - #73387
30.0.90; C-x v v in diff-mode doesn't work after C-c C-n

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>

Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:10:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.90

Done: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #115 received at 73387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 73387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: Re: bug#73387: 30.0.90; C-x v v in diff-mode doesn't work after C-c
 C-n
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 15:06:58 +0800
Hello,

On Thu 03 Oct 2024 at 09:33am +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
>> Cc: dgutov <at> yandex.ru,  73387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
>>   juri <at> linkov.net
>> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 08:50:37 +0800
>>
>> >   @item C-c @key{RET} k
>> >   Delete diff hunks other than the current one.  If the region is
>> >   active, this command deletes the hunks overlapped by the region;
>> >   otherwise it deletes all the hunks other than the current hunk.  Do
>> >   @emph{not} invoke this command in a narrowed buffer, as that could
>> >   produce unexpected results.
>>
>> Okay, I've rewritten based on this, though I haven't included the
>> imprecation, because invoking it in a narrowed buffer could never
>> produce unexpected results -- the function will always do nothing.
>
> Then why do we signal user-error in that case?  I think this should be
> explained in the manual.

I think I am using user-error wrongly.

Shall I just switch it to 'message', and rearrange the control flow so
nothing else happens?

-- 
Sean Whitton




This bug report was last modified 232 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.