GNU bug report logs - #73320
[PATCH] project--vc-list-files: use Git's sparse-index

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 73320 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sean Allred <allred.sean <at> gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
Cc: 73320 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73320: [PATCH] project--vc-list-files: use Git's sparse-index
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:36:40 -0500

Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev> writes:
> The submitted patch has a comma inside which results in an error

Well that's embarrassing. I've resolved this in my branch. I'm not sure
why I wasn't seeing an issue locally; perhaps I made this error somehow
after I eval'd the form for testing. Thanks for catching!

> But let's start from the beginning. Could you help me set up a sparse
> repo that would help test out the change?
>
> I took a large-ish checkout with shallow history and set up the sparse
> config like this:
>
>   git sparse-checkout init --cone
>   git sparse-checkout set gfx media
>
> With that, both 'git status' and 'ls' behave as expected - no extra
> directories around (just the top-level files and two subdirs).
>
> But 'git ls-files' and 'git ls-files --sparse' continue to show the
> same large output. Any idea what could be wrong? My version of Git,
> perhaps? Which is 2.40.1.

Sure! You're very close. The key is here in git-ls-files(1):

    --sparse
        If the index is sparse, show the sparse directories without
        expanding to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown
        with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x".

combined with this in git-sparse-checkout(1):

    Use the --[no-]sparse-index option to use a sparse index (the
    default is to not use it).

I fell into this too when setting up my worktree for testing; normally
our internal tooling takes care of this for me. To resolve this issue in
an existing checkout, you can simply

    git sparse-checkout init --sparse-index

and that will rewrite your index file using sparse-index rules.

> Yeah, I expect project-find-regexp, project-search,
> project-query-replace-regexp might start misbehaving without
> additional filtering -- either throwing up errors or, best case,
> continuing to search through the "hidden" directories.

Not sure how best to track that we should come back to this, but yeah.
It seems like the right place to add some sort of switch would be in the
`project-files` defmethod. From here, it looks like all the functions
you mention could choose the behavior right for them. (Based on the
function names alone -- it seems they would /also/ be interested in
operating on only those files which exist on disk.)

Incidentally looking at the version check within `project-files`, it's
worthwhile to point out that `--sparse` is likely /not/ compatible with
ancient versions of Git. Does vc have any sort of policy on requiring
recent versions of these tools? If the answer is 'not really', I'll
additionally want to add some sort of protection against using
`--sparse` when the Git version won't understand it. This should be easy
enough to do within the implementation of `project--vc-list-files`.

-- 
Sean Allred

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.