GNU bug report logs - #73288
Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch

Previous Next

Full log

Message #44 received at 73288 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>,
 Z572 <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>, 73288 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 09:33:53 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote:
>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Hello Guix,
>> >
>> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for
>> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is
>> > tracked at <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73071>. There is an update to
>> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and
>> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master).
>> >
>> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as
>> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out
>> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there.
>> >
>> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch
>> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of
>> > other blockers.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > John
>> 
>> maybe is time to merge?
>> 
>> see https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates
>> ci       have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85.5%
>> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%.
>> 
>> Is there anything else in the way?
>
> Comparing them against master and against each other:
> x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux
> i686:   comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8)
> aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0)
> armhf:  slight regression on bordeaux
> ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux
> riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2)
>
> I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge.  However,
> we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs
> mesa-updates:
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates/package-changes?x86_64-linux-change=blocked&x86_64-linux-change=still-blocked&x86_64-linux-change=unknown-to-blocked&x86_64-linux-change=new-blocked

bordeaux substitute availability has been going up for mesa-updates, but
it seems like a large number of changes hit master over the last week or
so which are taking priority, so that'll slow any work on mesa-updates.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.