From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Efraim Flashner X-Debbugs-Original-To: Guix-patches Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.172645433024776 (code B ref -1); Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:39:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2024 02:38:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1da-0006RX-A0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:50 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1dX-0006RJ-2f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1dJ-0004mB-82 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:34 -0400 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1dH-0000He-Kt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1726454300; x=1726713500; bh=9iym2db3foojUQmBcP3F2gzP1iMRUQaPZJGPBFRXLMM=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=mJ6cQFGVbCei5CzFNOa+zGp0iyhdjTZldCh1hhp4NOfSwSZPSlhxEdgLy0ozqKpuA +ZSNC3ozXDky/K3nh+i5cotjcaXqS+Hg6MT0knll/by1+KTDdLSUUxkUCvfn5T4Ksy 7ljyYA+7xq7+/dHXUM2fR+gubbz9SAKjYZukfoJrAglrNwEtQsbx01qLOCg+bIZVTL BAGSBBdrUYb3+EEs6XnNxbGbbaElATAcpw2Umki/pabzJcWPzS6AY3bn9Vtorp63dh TPVAyXbZA2x+jMGhJ1sKUebbUkQ1xgUU3p3C3/TBVlSn/5MFBlp2ZOPVCkN1lY+T75 lI2Zwkb7ih6QQ== Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:38:16 +0000 From: John Kehayias Message-ID: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 904cfd75f5579614973d1922d37b2b28b0ee2b52 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.22; envelope-from=john.kehayias@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4322.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello Guix, The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for merging. Besides s= ome other fixes and updates, the main series is tracked at . There is an update to add NVK support to mesa for x86_= 64-linux which I need to review and push (and rebase to get more fixes from= master). Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as well on = Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out on Bordeaux. P= erhaps Efraim can chime in there. With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch up a= gain in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of other blocker= s. Thanks! John From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 05:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: John Kehayias Cc: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.172706977820021 (code B ref 73288); Mon, 23 Sep 2024 05:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2024 05:36:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ssbk9-0005Cr-M4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:36:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:57587) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ssbk6-0005Ca-P6 for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:36:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb5b3c57eso38931385e9.2 for <73288@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:35:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727069686; x=1727674486; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2punjW+Jz07A52E7NP1T6ZzJZlZmL+Q3Xqysk+og9wQ=; b=Gid6p24u5le1sVEJQFyU3Ej4+0PHAhaGoEPj/riat/Qnnb3Xl7L7eljFQWHB/71UQd p5VL3qKIjF3gpB4nf542SdBp3qz1k/H8Vq1hGNTQK8dar8NFfM4jJbIu2Qlc3yVIFGXC /gme9OJ54IfAi0QscM99koJMwmoodxyt275120T76LD5MfO3aEaHzX7vzeYNxcSA7vIr UcK3v0WQhiPkNt+8Da2xmjZZk6JO3Bjoxez9hPSCwF08KXhlWuCtp1uZw3+ZXcwDInTW qhb4saSIU6RRCdCmiLdOXnFJ4Dtf0sV19gvW3ttZPX6Ns8f+nTHejCihBZm4MHqISUzf CPDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727069686; x=1727674486; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2punjW+Jz07A52E7NP1T6ZzJZlZmL+Q3Xqysk+og9wQ=; b=AFlhmCLHWpYRgGzZBlf4vJa0tOuleHFo3ySOiypOua9wq5T1C4lzCOOe24SfgKr4N+ lovdYH+jmmhkdgjuUtB1JvCPeRklt415CDqR8NzXcjck5Lps+1ofFyg0fjqduqjUfqeE 4q5GRHBXUwGwBLAW7atS4XpcF8LFXcgCN72LxYi/s6oB3RZ8Wsrv1AimAaMDNmjRrv0i Df/HXIoIn6rji4BOCSIoHZCYjsS73UaIJ5j+vXfQSfo+GAv+5W2mH5ap/cdJEkXENldY bNozMN1B8ODDxEI2t4xxq5HxZxJ+nMmdwV1fSsXbFGML6wBIvNqYfOMaOWkNdWdXf6zS 8ZHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwFrmx+KzYjql1s5wvfZhuE/2S44ue53aCIHhpqXpi/hiol2dLQ F1tvt77toue4d4qUjjltkntbbr/W13LyMetRRJVMnKCqGSy+M6an X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH7D7UhHWLhD6o+IvYoasKzBx270qRZYQ2p3maZs1CcElAeOBjXLd9rMXliM5dBmgyZbS1Z1g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:220d:b0:42c:bf79:78f7 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42e801d665fmr48273625e9.32.1727069685763; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([141.226.162.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-42e7afeb1c2sm89714605e9.36.2024.09.22.22.34.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 08:34:43 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , John Kehayias , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dQKpUhN/ClAaStKN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) --dQKpUhN/ClAaStKN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:38:16AM +0000, John Kehayias via Guix-patches vi= a wrote: > Hello Guix, >=20 > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for merging. Besides= some other fixes and updates, the main series is tracked at . There is an update to add NVK support to mesa for x8= 6_64-linux which I need to review and push (and rebase to get more fixes fr= om master). >=20 > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as well o= n Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out on Bordeaux.= Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >=20 > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch up= again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of other block= ers. >=20 I built out to gtk+@3 and gtk on aarch64 without any problems, and I also built mesa on riscv64 and armhf without any problems. I haven't tested running any programs on those architectures. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --dQKpUhN/ClAaStKN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmbw/fMACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GXsxAAsSiCnRjiTui+g6tASBbhqVaLL8E7rDvtNxZvWPCXBF4SKOwYoUSZVDUm jEDMFhJTB46CbdZ0pYak5Xo/y8EttJcMiOM0r8TaBVI7BQMjs5s2297bp7ViegRH WjYjqAQMQOwaDrdmVgaboMEFJS1Q3ckJbxMIStYIjSOiDJyk8wR6bWRSZwTX7mCO 7qdNJa9QV/60LBJGGPLfDz2XrsZe3USeAJzzjDkEpnyt5D5wE6rRqsQpF+5HkCcb KVhrerFOlUQpZIFIOPKkHsY9TwQRd5Q7ugM0RUc/n7QbqoBAwAWOBMhNo9W0uH5X 32RdbYIv4CW2YDrwK3EC1oIcUD7mGs7mHq/YAlTsHP6zUddGK1ja341uypIoLaOs GdUg9ZghMxE1goW3qkZs+mESRFtUJ1V7h3LZm3rb+cBRHD99JyIOk2DxRccUvKju Pzbx1K0q02G4aU+KWxwoQay/SboRXm5UVU7X8Q0S6evrcCF1zSw5nmYZK7Z19Ne9 GX5vx4P1P6Ozlw47vE1Lantu6SHtXI648Xjl0IyZQcpil+Xr1kh7lDUShHdrcQXE pzxji7GlUBarXFA9ZoIfTUU6BHvmn+rUKTR6o1kW6xy43iggLsGrBf3Lgux4RsQy b+8oSJTIurzhfZzj68V/KFwZV66IDRpH3B1B1al8bYk4Wo7goNs= =7LP3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dQKpUhN/ClAaStKN-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.172765515313018 (code B ref 73288); Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2024 00:12:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sv41h-0003Nu-Ca for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:12:33 -0400 Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]:10159) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sv41e-0003Nl-NO for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:12:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1727655112; x=1727914312; bh=pidRaG/G4x1+he7aFhrE8zb2Yg/jUVG6KdSDDtbx7Yc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=rRcSvxq+8piUQtyQDoq4fXSKmbQSCq4tLDNejvINz0RoaITB+QRNqALB2HNOarvlU DVj629xI5YCXas03SksYBI8/8Tc2b7vvGiyd//GHZtIFlYQk2po9O2N4WmACz1sCCV yD71ohQrM4I7PhuP7KzHMLnrCeFWc91KNIb+ruhYAg2BMjLdS542ErsfOzmcgnbAsY n+A5xIzHByIDS6xlFx7+oVY4Hh1tH+4xwx198LhRohVejl5up4QCJrWwfrL8Muf8Vb qvOaGbGEVIrVVhQLMN1h2lwhSrhwoN1g+S2B/f3ZBQAa+r3dNPnjDN2KbvLjCQNyKe Sse121H7037gg== Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:11:49 +0000 From: John Kehayias Message-ID: <87msjq57b3.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 1e924a847b3d950ec1fc375a7019c8b19803b479 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Thanks for the report and testing, Efraim! I'm cc'ing guix-devel to see if anyone else wants to weigh in here: On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 08:34 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:38:16AM +0000, John Kehayias via Guix-patches = via wrote: >> Hello Guix, >> >> The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for merging. >> Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is tracked at >> . There is an update to add NVK >> support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and push >> (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >> >> Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >> well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >> on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >> >> With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to >> catch up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware >> of other blockers. >> > > I built out to gtk+@3 and gtk on aarch64 without any problems, and I > also built mesa on riscv64 and armhf without any problems. > > I haven't tested running any programs on those architectures. Progress on QA/Bordeaux is, from what I hear, waiting in line behind other branch merge requests (one is from many months ago and I don't think will be ready soon). I think this branch is ready to merge, the only potential issue is lower substitute coverage on non-i686/x86_64-linux architectures. (Note that although QA shows only in the 80% range, it was about the same as master before the more recent rebases. No idea why as I can't find new failures that would cause this.) So, what shall we do? Personally, I would merge it now with the understanding that substitutes will take time (weeks? months?) to catch up. I don't think we have the capacity to be quicker even if there was only one active non-master branch for these architectures. Is this correct? While at times issues crop up, in my experience the mesa update part of mesa-updates (which is almost entirely what is in this current branch) rarely causes many issues, just lots of rebuilds. We can also always revert if something was missed. I would be happy to add a news entry as a warning to anyone relying on substitutes for other architectures, if that is helpful. Thoughts? Concerns? Guidance we can solidify going forward? Thanks! John From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> Resent-From: Sharlatan Hellseher Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, ludo@gnu.org, steve@futurile.net Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.17279024921937 (code B ref 73288); Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2024 20:54:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59387 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sw6N2-0000VB-3L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 16:54:52 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f44.google.com ([209.85.167.44]:49488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sw6My-0000Uu-Eh for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 16:54:51 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539983beb19so224242e87.3 for <73288@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 13:54:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727902421; x=1728507221; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u77EEKbIyDGLkF/VcdF6o/rG85ZfbX5c6yS59K7pqW0=; b=Id+rMMXQ0n4q6vJztcNd8FQnUGuR8iaKji/ICySSB1P/iD5hmAmDh/cqiPd6+rEus1 VFeBVgP2Nfwg217j6mjQzMYV0IYb+iTe4YzR/5DQb9pY2Vwk5emVGT3uZ5lMEwQhuc4W D1K1jYWuhzqKBOJ6Wd3KXX0/+2R5vvDKM56EkBxToFMszE/sWkDgOaT6FsQgnk800JSR hReIi8ng7T79Q5Lg9H7xWqI/WLM3trj35Pt4cm9d5oZobKp8IJGGzIAqrNF+/1gbOPaV +s9mqvP2/2SbT0W7kmjVPBmj1HnUegSv3U8Ex/pyT+qW47eo/mzzUgtLKKXvVWQi49gD prng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727902421; x=1728507221; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u77EEKbIyDGLkF/VcdF6o/rG85ZfbX5c6yS59K7pqW0=; b=wws5WJ4I4hxmSvDk+TW+27InKXhtN3ECCwE4CtxKiCrbYxGSJNSkBFuOWAj45koGfm zgRDfWYe7Wd89mwIUvpIQFLQxYJqxuSsM+MKZjUHl7fIqlPqg8g9f5N+kU/3u5BHiSf1 LHyQN49kYRj3a14h1sOfXQ1c9Fv0ijD3AciOrJ9kaG/53V3jF/EZfbGNRVYYiYBvjP5u 7rHoK/qfqG5ApfzGB83z3VCazzglPmxicvxzYPKl3+0ppVUYPAo39VL5Gh0Kz5vzN7v+ SNWn40Yg4j5liQGxi8wlzBzSPhVj5nK6E573VGbgKNTeWnNjagWmVgaQ4eQj50HpZ/Ya dcqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyspPJ0R4Jdd2RXLw3YM8jEE7ViC8iqRdVoxOv2YCPVcT62UOgC 79gBsV7xjcUw2Rrnzyb9q+WobimhA/vTCzwZsjjtK2Pn5Czv53BewXua4HuR X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF5IwwicOzlHC+FRD1iAgrkb6L18LLHooNb9yxJRRwgge81qXK5ppTB31U/gWmwa43k7+SGyA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31c8:b0:52c:a5cb:69e4 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539a07a3603mr2736020e87.54.1727902420874; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 13:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guxtil (cpc100684-bagu15-2-0-cust967.1-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.8.111.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a93c2777214sm902550966b.36.2024.10.02.13.53.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Oct 2024 13:53:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Sharlatan Hellseher Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 21:53:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87cyki6xbi.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The current queue of branches awaiting for review and merge: | 71408 | python-team | Fri Jun 07 10:55:25+0200 2024 | Done | | 72959 | fonts-split-outputs | Mon Sep 02 12:55:25+0200 2024 | Open | | 73104 | r-team | Sat Sep 07 17:55:24+0200 2024 | Open | | 73288 | mesa-updates | Mon Sep 16 04:38:25+0200 2024 | Open | | 73502 | go-team | Thu Sep 26 23:40:25+0200 2024 | Open | | 73515 | qt-team | Fri Sep 27 14:46:24+0200 2024 | Open | | 73558 | wip-gsl-upgrade | Sun Sep 29 22:33:24+0200 2024 | Open | | 73567 | lisp-team | Mon Sep 30 15:43:28+0200 2024 | Open | =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/python-team #71408 It was closed due to a large amount of merge conflicts which can't be resolved quick enough not blocking other changes (CC Steve who started cherry pick process) =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/fonts-split-outputs #72959 Needs to be rebased and place new evaluation (Cc Ludovic) =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/r-team #73104 I've pinged R team members if that branch may be merged, the changes touch just R packages from CRAN and Bioconductor. QA passed. =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates #73288 I'd love to have that branch merged, it would help to pack more projects for Astro* soft =3D).=20 =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/go-team #73502 I've rebased it recently and pushed again it looks like most of the major builds passed successfully, some architectures (aarch64) are lagged behind. The branch is ready and would let me complete packaging Prometheus and start large unbundle task. =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/qt-team #73515 QA is unhappy: "Unable to check changes between branch and master. Merge base has not be processed by the data service yet." =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/wip-gsl-upgrade #73558 not picked up yet: "Unable to check changes between branch and maste= r. Merge base has not be processed by the data service yet." =2D https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/lisp-team #73567 not picked up yet: "Information unavailable" =2D- Oleg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEmEeB3micIcJkGAhndtcnv/Ys0rUFAmb9stEACgkQdtcnv/Ys 0rV8whAAqmUw4gOO0+Y6pSI2RGTsiGysv2rkKzPJfq8dm1F3lGRQb1yvK0bR4Frj uiDSn7VMkkXER40mhPXcUKBpHEgcab7PnFOxCQvHYeBtVugxTGWUNqVqfn7UZ5i7 tbulesRVECeyoshNFH5XMLuL5dnQAISguTE/5Hotidwhv93cf7qzeWqijfKb1PIW I2pfqh0qDf8Gg0VypSBdQr0EVy9EN4l4kcfyJnuTZjbt0YBKoxK0fvWU+EqXA+/h bL5uPn6tnG0yAjOaFpM91CmOPV4Gkk6K+st6+TDwc1dBqum/44jHJ8BAl2zpglt6 eb4HlU+WAQ593UgnTfE2e30fdq7Gm74zcvxRyfWAcL+iu+82sqaBCc7vIHQXgxLI +zy3NhpBUsAs6hPcXIzj14Z//zM3Ve4ZIgGtBtj646AdWIUZa/JlJGEb1MNK5fsj VKOtuVH8dip5bFUp70h08V7z+AB4Gzw6RYMnYrdgoGDUKnx0YV7ETCambeuhIiGX ecP6gO8+Qsd/1+II3leGGPgBkPJgYjoKecsmTj/2F3pfIrYGsS4nCE3TeuhVBmaD bRijOyhXYqSKhETEH3tzO0/Mtss1uUwfyhEkioDfFwASI4kTkRCmaiC8AyLT4kBz dkCdm3WsgP01q1EGF4mSx0BoOGUH+xSR8X+AYSqH8eTL58nAwlE= =Qi/n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Steve George Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 09:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Sharlatan Hellseher , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, ludo@gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.172794606325828 (code B ref 73288); Thu, 03 Oct 2024 09:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2024 09:01:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59982 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swHhd-0006hq-Sr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 05:01:03 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit05.runbox.com ([185.226.149.38]:49212) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swHhL-0006VS-TF for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 05:00:50 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit03.runbox ([10.9.9.163] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit05.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1swHdN-0002WR-V4; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 10:56:29 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=futurile.net; s=selector1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID; bh=YwLE+Evt3Q11C1quHM4ToautatIeH0vkjJADqIX+vTk=; b=RyM9tKDS9NClZLxmIP+4OYK8cC Hl7bEUhvaPgs4qBb498Z1KQU4wSbT1K1kICjDMj4MsPZXd9pPD9CeMWkmDDRc45v+uf5HhYCX/OBs 07B21T8+X9zirUm3yC+X5zOsZ4Ht+MoLEwcV8ZXKUyRnVl9/p5Bg9CuS2r8ALRGzfItRoAUhrqMJZ vJPuZXPDr25KQEdnxJHuOMB69k1qrIuBbaQJ0UxzcWHt2URcIxVzTWZ123PeNsgnbdyveJ0ue14De uPGA0jiebpnShPl64++VQ1ARXL41P3LJKWm1441DbjrQciWXsW417K2y0iZrd9kcP/wPJwpJceVYv z1847HRw==; Received: from [10.9.9.74] (helo=submission03.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swHdN-0001nH-7x; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 10:56:29 +0200 Received: by submission03.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (641962)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) id 1swHdC-0005Bq-NJ; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 10:56:18 +0200 Message-ID: <69a3b3fb-4317-4d8d-b5a2-104dd62c8222@futurile.net> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 09:56:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird References: <87cyki6xbi.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Steve George In-Reply-To: <87cyki6xbi.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On 02/10/2024 21:53, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: (...) > The current queue of branches awaiting for review and merge: > > | 71408 | python-team | Fri Jun 07 10:55:25+0200 2024 | Done | > | 72959 | fonts-split-outputs | Mon Sep 02 12:55:25+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73104 | r-team | Sat Sep 07 17:55:24+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73288 | mesa-updates | Mon Sep 16 04:38:25+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73502 | go-team | Thu Sep 26 23:40:25+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73515 | qt-team | Fri Sep 27 14:46:24+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73558 | wip-gsl-upgrade | Sun Sep 29 22:33:24+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73567 | lisp-team | Mon Sep 30 15:43:28+0200 2024 | Open | > (...) > - https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/r-team > #73104 I've pinged R team members if that branch may be merged, the > changes touch just R packages from CRAN and Bioconductor. QA passed. (...) What's the definition of when a branch looks good for merging? Does some % of substitutes have to be achieved, and for which architectures? https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/r-team shows 96% for x86_64 which is .4 % higher than current master [0]. So it's a win by merging it! ;-) Seriously, it's also at 96% for aarch64-linux (bordeaux). So "it looks good to me". If that's the case, what prevents this "just" being merged? Presumably r-team demonstrated their desire for it to be merged by opening the merge request ticket. Is it a break in process if someone else does it? (rather than waiting for them to respond). > - https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates > #73288 I'd love to have that branch merged, it would help to pack more > projects for Astro* soft =). https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates doesn't look as good to me. Fine on x86_64, but aarch64-linux is lower than master. Unsure if this is due to the build farms still trying to catch-up? > - https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/go-team > #73502 I've rebased it recently and pushed again it looks like most of > the major builds passed successfully, some architectures (aarch64) are > lagged behind. The branch is ready and would let me complete packaging > Prometheus and start large unbundle task. This looks about the same as Mesa-upates to me. Is there a way to compare master<-->go-team to see if different packages are failing? We shouldn't make master break in new ways by merging right! Steve / Futurile [0] https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/master From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Steve George Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 09:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Sharlatan Hellseher , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, ludo@gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.172794616826003 (code B ref 73288); Thu, 03 Oct 2024 09:03:01 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2024 09:02:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59987 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swHjL-0006l9-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 05:02:48 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit05.runbox.com ([185.226.149.38]:60574) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swHj7-0006kg-Od for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 05:02:36 -0400 Received: from mailtransmit02.runbox ([10.9.9.162] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit05.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1swHis-00037p-QP; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:02:10 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=futurile.net; s=selector1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID; bh=wAlFPWsQ3DRqrS2/rWJ3AYk+zBomFfFO8fY/q5AcJx4=; b=5KSSWtcHgbERM2Gq0tbvu/Yp7+ 5c2ndwuZMYOvIdj0G7BZ9jSCQI5G2flbi1kEpPz+YCl7hBAzaT636IqF2SXelXpUgV/N0HZLCjdje CctEBCm4q6mVJ1pw9Tay6HlvJJeELjLj130Z6bR3/wm+bmE9wv/ABpSkmGv1j5jL2b/d56rUq4O9l bpc/PpVDeCcRsKxXwZfMamLS6PVtcxynRJam2jqHuuCpINRzPpj92x2vGtqWJyaExQEw3mbVNCWYi PHoBsH0/0A69EGCyjzy51SlakmnxDWwezKDpAorgTB3/vyfz09PVJxwqN8zEaFn0rrnKvh9VIlC6K IstA7bsw==; Received: from [10.9.9.74] (helo=submission03.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swHir-0002sb-D1; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:02:09 +0200 Received: by submission03.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (641962)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) id 1swHiW-0007dy-GW; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:01:48 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 10:01:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird References: <87cyki6xbi.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Steve George In-Reply-To: <87cyki6xbi.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 02/10/2024 21:53, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > > Hi, > > The current queue of branches awaiting for review and merge: > > | 71408 | python-team | Fri Jun 07 10:55:25+0200 2024 | Done | > | 72959 | fonts-split-outputs | Mon Sep 02 12:55:25+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73104 | r-team | Sat Sep 07 17:55:24+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73288 | mesa-updates | Mon Sep 16 04:38:25+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73502 | go-team | Thu Sep 26 23:40:25+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73515 | qt-team | Fri Sep 27 14:46:24+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73558 | wip-gsl-upgrade | Sun Sep 29 22:33:24+0200 2024 | Open | > | 73567 | lisp-team | Mon Sep 30 15:43:28+0200 2024 | Open | > > - https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/python-team > #71408 It was closed due to a large amount of merge conflicts which > can't be resolved quick enough not blocking other changes (CC Steve who > started cherry pick process) > There are 231 commits ahead of master. I propose to break this into groups of 30-50 commits at a time. Excluding the build-system changes that Lars [0] said they would do. Rebase on current master and test that they don't make master 'worse' [1] Each 30-50 can be put into a new branch for a smaller 'merge-train', to see if it makes merging faster overall. I did the first 31 and tested them. A new branch and merge-request could be created for them [2]. I need someone to collaborate with as I can't do that myself. However, looks like everyone in python-team is busy atm. I'll cherry-pick the next tranche if someone has the time to work with me on merging them - otherwise I'm wasting my time :-) Steve / Futurile [0] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71408#8 [1] no additional breakage, though there are quite a few broken packages [2] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71408#13 From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Steve George Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, Sharlatan Hellseher , =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.172803010423545 (code B ref 73288); Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2024 08:21:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZH-00067h-HS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:21:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZF-00067M-IG for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:21:42 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZ4-00032a-C1; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:21:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=eMfSS3DiYLtP4YhaTjMgrny22MnJdJHhq9SwmAVzuig=; b=GyDhL0+92TL0kunx4j34 teTOEUBR3nAErN0oO/CXepftdUjgLw8aCBWB1qzTp5cPD6AMTqIRW9Nikixdw3fwjfFkDexNpNPQ/ I97DnX1SIteT/8voHhe0/07MQp+rpe74UP58jMe+vvCJhLPofgheFGrgaoc8MxCN61lbLVIiI05Lw SK48zhZv411yIc1v9qMMCfWjl45xboWJ2T8QxXW9TmxCPwKJwcoBPguOTtZKZhSx1khQSCDL5YEJn 911XloDKNjpbhnBiuNTgskZCJJv2a53eoGe3y0lime4t9nPJJdwenNDsmfnVFijPlG6iaD+U8izH+ WJIuJSR5zDeRMA==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <69a3b3fb-4317-4d8d-b5a2-104dd62c8222@futurile.net> (Steve George's message of "Thu, 3 Oct 2024 09:56:17 +0100") References: <87cyki6xbi.fsf@gmail.com> <69a3b3fb-4317-4d8d-b5a2-104dd62c8222@futurile.net> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87v7y8s2go.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello! Steve George skribis: > On 02/10/2024 21:53, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > (...) >> The current queue of branches awaiting for review and merge: >> | 71408 | python-team | Fri Jun 07 10:55:25+0200 2024 | Done >> | >> | 72959 | fonts-split-outputs | Mon Sep 02 12:55:25+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73104 | r-team | Sat Sep 07 17:55:24+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73288 | mesa-updates | Mon Sep 16 04:38:25+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73502 | go-team | Thu Sep 26 23:40:25+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73515 | qt-team | Fri Sep 27 14:46:24+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73558 | wip-gsl-upgrade | Sun Sep 29 22:33:24+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73567 | lisp-team | Mon Sep 30 15:43:28+0200 2024 | Open | >>=20 > (...) >> - https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/r-team >> #73104 I've pinged R team members if that branch may be merged, the >> changes touch just R packages from CRAN and Bioconductor. QA passed. > (...) > > What's the definition of when a branch looks good for merging? Does > some % of substitutes have to be achieved, and for which > architectures? > > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/r-team shows 96% for x86_64 which is .4 > % higher than current master [0]. So it's a win by merging it! ;-) > Seriously, it's also at 96% for aarch64-linux (bordeaux). So "it looks > good to me". > > If that's the case, what prevents this "just" being merged? > > Presumably r-team demonstrated their desire for it to be merged by > opening the merge request ticket. Is it a break in process if someone > else does it? (rather than waiting for them to respond). My take is that by filing a =E2=80=9Crequest to merge=E2=80=9D, you claim r= esponsibility for carrying out the work until it=E2=80=99s merged, unless otherwise state= d. To me, R team folks are responsible for merging =E2=80=98r-team=E2=80=99 be= cause they=E2=80=99re the one who know and they haven=E2=80=99t expressed the desire to get it me= rged when it=E2=80=99s good on qa.guix (they didn=E2=80=99t click on =E2=80=9Cau= to-merge=E2=80=9D, in GitLab parlance ;-)). That said, if there=E2=80=99s no feedback from the R team in a timely fashi= on, maybe it=E2=80=99s OK to move to the next branch in the queue. FWIW, I also pinged =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 regarding =E2=80=98fonts-sp= lit-outputs=E2=80=99. If we can=E2=80=99t get it merged real soon, we should probably skip it. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Advance in queue References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 14:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.172934906414545 (code B ref 73288); Sat, 19 Oct 2024 14:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2024 14:44:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t2Agq-0003mS-Ca for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 10:44:24 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:44954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t2Agn-0003m7-L2; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 10:44:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340BC8D8; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:43:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UCprTEFFj0Eg; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:43:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98E0A1C4; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:43:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:43:49 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, I have just pushed the fonts-split-outputs branch, which had been built on QA, after rebasing it on master. Now I have rebased mesa-updates on the (new) master branch and pushed it; normally it should be picked up and built automatically by QA. Thanks to you all for your patience! Andreas From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> Resent-From: Sharlatan Hellseher Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: John Kehayias , Andreas Enge Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.173040342119213 (code B ref 73288); Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2024 19:37:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43882 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6ayb-0004zm-FP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:37:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com ([209.85.221.49]:43192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6aya-0004zW-0T for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:37:00 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37d8901cb98so1566783f8f.0 for <73288@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:36:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730403354; x=1731008154; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8/7M4urgbnS84KV5/E6MO5WcpwT6zthdIfx1Sj+Md9A=; b=PBttke+eNaL37vjbinOV60cB0RVZrOYCZDdnocFmRixgPD0oo9Jt+dQbhKPhq7fvmq RwaGqhxkoP/8FLOW6vFcSbNWT/dUWemT5drdENL/V5vvEnk8PkG4RWITKI0zRynEhfld zfzSDDv0Akyr0vTTcbjIc+JPEoDCzqUm8vlY6z0M4eLnBKRhnFTr65UzZT+15cTycP2l zcOnlatlJLNwq7KE5LhiLXejXL5WjeCMGJhpobFY3Tt8ZKubEjFj90wQGkYZIhJBFHMQ 1Oxxccfah5Fxs9e5TaukJCLrMkZSoU3OWoRp11uvmYrbYeVRiS8hGlye8l/yqondMmrp XbkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730403354; x=1731008154; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8/7M4urgbnS84KV5/E6MO5WcpwT6zthdIfx1Sj+Md9A=; b=xU+NfX8kZ0qqjIs79Iz93Oe/h3LAKHWi7WxQqhzddPuN8uB1QoIDi9tkucF/FMBsJI beo5Av4XlFWz5vRomiHD4sRHPB0U4dD2j/PEG/U1U9sLRZTHJi/216vEpcwrIlwbodpa ZaOVvSyQqvGCqttAM160cu/x9s4LZvMbRLJ08wLPzF1tZn0dwASRsFGnqhozYghYqdcl 5Kf1gJJeooI6vXtrqnCItbZIH3j8Ph8oMTEtx6H/RaPHkpLUXycBYo2UdaKA77A6QDAx w3afRIq6DYGWiNVqrHVrMqFd0E6LQ7WyvdLwGxxvGd1WGBeeXu974kEcwOisXzNozDgx Bnsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxD0gY2LpeevVOaZ7psrP12R/znfWHc2l2BG8xJdOodvn81ZHaq vf5ntAW+V4I1yi1FJtU2ai+JH7hQ1m0ve+yOhYABu5+YySic/dTK X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEVsGKUFBY7LRw3kKKarnRRhOQVK9dHk6njuUCA0HrSLqiWdVlO76o9FZOlkHslIZoabdxCEg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2a2:b0:378:8b56:4665 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-381c14d495cmr3153478f8f.24.1730403354037; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guxtil (cpc100684-bagu15-2-0-cust967.1-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.8.111.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-381c10d4141sm2991196f8f.28.2024.10.31.12.35.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:35:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Sharlatan Hellseher Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:35:49 +0000 Message-ID: <874j4suktm.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello! Advance in queue Hope it's ready to proceed. -- Oleg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEmEeB3micIcJkGAhndtcnv/Ys0rUFAmcj3BUACgkQdtcnv/Ys 0rXJ/g/5ARXlguvOuAHzG42r9AwX4+kWEzCEGNhzUqP5AGHGkXK6ZgT9r3QBaPK3 wx71C/MIhjpbXkLhr+rs6xEhw3GDrwf99FtD1Uv8OmGKQiscaidAZnGJVeViP0Rj d0DbdpEhdjQ/CJEurFGwEuJd6rg01tum7r1bLSIoHdpuW09WgHr/EQDo5xZ1Ub/R ICljk139HRwZmfYva4IxFG8myzbpl5q6/kojssF3dM0OcSTNRd7kneyXe/xXWMuF ehIO+ddVAe3QMVePViort3yEREPJfj61YzzIojCBHTgGI/fepsAiGiLav1NYHvmq Ez7aS08ABbstWfxqLxRrVNYNW0NhQCNFnT489Ciz56rfhE1m7CFqriv4VFpSH5gq XJmMJKoMIoiH8ASo3pHjVBPuTsCqfodj4Odtn4iypqElMg+eQJnEIqvI95SypHBB 3tjlKPP0SRUD7wpM2acR0aViAlCPQYpoifvojbbJVLsJLLsj9yi2RsnLGUiv9kdg 1cl5wYFqz6m+SKnj/Un7aUcuZvEQav8DAMcwrD4ZI3ivDCN5bTZIlFPQ00pKhOfx YKnN+RS+7URkE7/DlLfS9NtfnRhOgDAFbjgwSHfgZyVsJgNbOPFoB/wnrHKD8Oyc ubvOWgl6aZBp/5hFg9JpWKrIMsdYJ5dd45iBclcx74CWvvqc07I= =ZK5O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Z572 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 10:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, efraim.flashner@gmail.com X-Debbugs-Original-To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: John Kehayias , Efraim Flashner , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.17306282921879 (code B ref -1); Sun, 03 Nov 2024 10:05:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2024 10:04:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7XTX-0000UF-J6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 05:04:51 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44046) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7XTU-0000U9-OY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 05:04:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t7XTU-00044D-4c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 05:04:48 -0500 Received: from smtp84.cstnet.cn ([159.226.251.84] helo=cstnet.cn) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t7XTR-000352-4R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 05:04:47 -0500 Received: from m (unknown [107.174.64.25]) by APP-05 (Coremail) with SMTP id zQCowADX3vKgSidnPqU6DQ--.51867S2; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 18:04:26 +0800 (CST) From: Z572 In-Reply-To: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> (John Kehayias via Guix-patches via's message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:38:16 +0000") References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 18:04:08 +0800 Message-ID: <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-CM-TRANSID: zQCowADX3vKgSidnPqU6DQ--.51867S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Wry8Xr13Jw1fCw4xAF4rAFb_yoWDZFX_u3 4kAF4vqr4Dt393XF4aqr1ag3s0yFyjqa40qryqqrWYqw1DZa9Iva93GF98Xa1Ika95Grn0 y3WDGw4xW34aqjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUb7kYjsxI4VWkKwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26F4j6r4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4 A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487M2AExVA0xI80 1c8C04v7Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7V C2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JMxAIw28I cxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2 IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI 42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42 IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280 aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUgg_TUUUUU X-Originating-IP: [107.174.64.25] X-CM-SenderInfo: x2kh0wxmxqyx3h6l2u1dvotugofq/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.226.251.84; envelope-from=zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn; helo=cstnet.cn X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: > Hello Guix, > > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is > tracked at . There is an update to > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). > > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. > > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of > other blockers. > > Thanks! > John maybe is time to merge? see https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85.5% bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. Is there anything else in the way? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfr6klGDOXiwIdX/bO1qpk+Gi3/AFAmcnSpgACgkQO1qpk+Gi 3/COrw/+P1s8nWgtmKPxG/9ICeNbc4u0apQVjE2O0pS7j0AAIwGFOUgnEAm1YSN4 2E1n0goOQh14oPb7uAaVhHTPQiq734+lb22jVJ9qJAEZlp5yBZOAxEuAy26zLWaG v68yuZuSHC+9VhuerSdVWDN+Ji1ksRhbVA7gX3nfPtjOdW0eQW7PhWnwtCPzMpgo n/hxyt/X6aV5CmXdRZCJX3YfMk+YhVsqB3upd6OyDEbdDVC9xT4rABHM1aQ8NDZA SzuWhyhmnaRYvMC/0Q/m6yRCR6trxamLRSwgpf5Jate3AKemk8bMBCp/DnW4+XYL dYLBjFFTsw3RGVgNP4agncrDFnnl164ezrgOTv5aWQSb6697YFrIwHT0JKWDjlEn FVMMHNpbLDRZtKQPDpPkdpeNCDZZjEPv6T1Thz6If/SmP83YcESgtcKgHjAIoA00 uCDogMT1XZupNxJ+SSX5JdnhHl4WbfC4Cu/J3mJT2zMAsMiVZPT/GPWWrhC2C/6j 14p5IZLhpPjEVKfWwPk6jwu4t/uSRfq55Z0UK9nkkv1vb97Tytg3OIqEHxOEe4oj hmflk32OaNySMiC7Lc2h1duKTO+s0gQS3HitJUeTSaYRidvuZnAgY5amP5iWMJQW C/qaHhcMyvCcVVUbW1bIznV+cph5X7Z9y0a7Pgkwq3rii1vnp2k= =xgT/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 13:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Z572 Cc: John Kehayias , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.173063903624068 (code B ref 73288); Sun, 03 Nov 2024 13:04:01 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2024 13:03:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7aGp-0006G8-Rb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 08:03:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:59851) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7aGn-0006Fs-6T for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 08:03:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-431695fa98bso25683785e9.3 for <73288@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 05:03:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730638972; x=1731243772; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oR5dW5nH/5jqC6OATxcPuOML44FzNxXabzWhSFUHR/8=; b=gW6hlnYB3uQ+Ckrh2BECXPgfx9hxTxsduMQNURamkqLVegnTLgmTsxeHXA8ZlkCFiS DciNMrO/E9uOGVacHOSanf8eTOERGUiygUSuQ6q35bRFR5m1IETaBhLkcmEW6YQZIa+5 RprfeJujZ94B4FQ/l1aHHFlR4TfVuSKs1BotGDt51g7erUlcmi9a6GdaAg3WRKU/bhnx Oa9vwQOO9gl9Kgp/SP4+gLB6fpsINNnEYo5fi/5xShCTJCWYMS02cSbEkrlyI2S+SbWL DI/kyjYfIod5vrBokqrsrRvmwMXtczMDFoVEKIHXoYdjUZo32KGOzWLf6GX8xNpyyN0v +Hgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730638972; x=1731243772; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oR5dW5nH/5jqC6OATxcPuOML44FzNxXabzWhSFUHR/8=; b=OYg/87fVnpxGmbaH5WHijqhNE1WFF5aa0tn9u1EsFzxQxBeTc0fjqz4YiQkpL+5XuQ brmRhTA5s6S2l4lAnROztwfuCshikfB84kWtjKh5lFxSt14NMpHF+LTVzr9p4S46UPHR wGefLKiEXZjG24c5coBacgkQFViWN2Tf7dKLqDoi8For6HPFULdgoVcfhsOjbKUOhQoS ci9qSpl08iNg481bIck6jnJ7PWewXlO77erCOashOcoPoaI7P36Tp/b6cjS4BXKa8RFW JQTg63vNf1wJBSS59ixiGrtE9eN2RwLz9Dt0+g//WNfjr2EetwUsiKb6TckvedZ8Av6p mF7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJDV0mwmb3bxuvK7pfyuCcOUXy9WYL6AypBkIzG0eazCIywAy0 VfWiXHPeauI9d748tSBhrMYJ0c2wR9m72n+kgbgbQhSLG5qJAznB X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFPCR/PkKuBNLtnfeEKAa6uBtabzG/YGE/Sw4l5pgb//eCWrZJwdMReZJzHWvASWON+E3JWtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3ca3:b0:42f:823d:dde9 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4319acbba20mr275382545e9.21.1730638971923; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 05:02:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([141.226.162.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-431bd9ca747sm152582685e9.45.2024.11.03.05.02.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 03 Nov 2024 05:02:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:02:49 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Z572 , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org, John Kehayias References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QeX6+qFituG3bt1+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --QeX6+qFituG3bt1+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: > John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >=20 > > Hello Guix, > > > > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for > > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is > > tracked at . There is an update to > > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and > > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). > > > > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as > > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out > > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. > > > > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch > > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of > > other blockers. > > > > Thanks! > > John >=20 > maybe is time to merge? >=20 > see https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates > ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85.= 5% > bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux 79.4%, aa= rch64-linux 89.0%. >=20 > Is there anything else in the way? Comparing them against master and against each other: x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) armhf: slight regression on bordeaux ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs mesa-updates: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates/package-changes?x86_64-linux-ch= ange=3Dblocked&x86_64-linux-change=3Dstill-blocked&x86_64-linux-change=3Dun= known-to-blocked&x86_64-linux-change=3Dnew-blocked However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably just needs to be sent through again. It looks okay to me --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --QeX6+qFituG3bt1+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmcndHYACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HdGw/+Jpjuzc3GTRE1wriuFB1HUu8fRvdYEQeHTZUz14iiWeiWLIyovAwnYx/6 FuBRQ5thDuhT2ffdRwLmmmc71ajbBJ1ZVVqapKFTW3xnBb7sl4AaWVtdvRDnoS1F 1GLymmpJDZCl7kVMxrqbtfkSRPZJq1EVaze6EA6BxqXiMbO8euNLno8oesKSIfjH EPZooVBKMMda/wGPtAAiGu7R/Fu6fzw42SKrUeU/i6BbK4X95Q4itDLrBWAbhcDC d6K9qnDloHMr3E9G88p6qg5r1yiAnNdsYGkyIsc+EI9NO9+RYBQODd6WrIBykb6h N5A0858Z2ha5TeZmJPGfIhV4nzSB1wdKWApjoa/R/csCF4K/nZG7DmJCtYJEBaDW gLJANC3cHTPkfbmdDk/VsRncgWLaCs43pbSiEsiwEIa3wAWKNxgBxTnoMvFhkWzu 3yOGKNT2lWAn9LC3KshvEirxHBH4b1mheda4IRMryury7jQ24jyzzJmgl9flGiUC +X5PjNl+IUwh2Oh7TIY287RefMXwgNbPApdiy1QvesvMtvZsYqsChvtyWKo7KbPV SEKLxjdptmCocLzxO8iPiJLf7Kw7LyhIvREF5tBMKvpKtJcMgpjkCsZbjiaz4KO3 e3kiRWymQgtNAQdCjgJaLZWakEXpyJ5p69SSwX/TKLsXgMqDy78= =jFRW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QeX6+qFituG3bt1+-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner Cc: Josselin Poiret , Z572 , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.173068756628603 (code B ref 73288); Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2024 02:32:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mtZ-0007RF-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:32:45 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:34425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mtW-0007R7-9G for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:32:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1730687556; x=1730946756; bh=+4b8TbsDsmfJt6WHM6NJe/cTgG2EBawQPdxP4rtah7E=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=JIHtgVYQ1LMKB0kKGVdUXS1x/6Wa/1jhxVhIhYaVYJugkkd0CoPnfFdC4ucZ2QoA8 TMbxkyms1Ph8v41iYXeBFKt2xdhrzsMhG1r8TV+5sl6TW811RAJXIylRoYYMUuDj04 vbe33ilzPgtYpPCjFOiFfTpn2EhedorUoZvfTE1ai6MPg1YiHPpjQPIaxDBmCMjF/q URHpy+UzoGihtdncptoGS5x0G7+W9oc0uoi+mR3fB7HTow5ZDn3ResF0CKqj2eBG+T U1HVV9/y8xDPIxYS2iqMgSs4eP7w+BUoKBUV1/J2cFslEhG2pCFJc0VRAA+MgqzBEU txC4JxS5Yeapw== Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:32:31 +0000 From: John Kehayias Message-ID: <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: ebab285e9d4fda3748caf92b29fffd2b89670287 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi all, On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >> >> > Hello Guix, >> > >> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >> > tracked at . There is an update to >> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >> > >> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >> > >> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch >> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >> > other blockers. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > John >> >> maybe is time to merge? >> >> see >> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85= .5% >> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >> >> Is there anything else in the way? > > Comparing them against master and against each other: > x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux > i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) > aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) > armhf: slight regression on bordeaux > ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux > riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) > > I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, > we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs > mesa-updates: > > > However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are > substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably just > needs to be sent through again. > > It looks okay to me I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch of p= atches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just waiting = for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be there as noted ab= ove after waiting for other branches and recent Berlin issues. I have been = running my system on this branch for a couple weeks as well. However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I remember) Swa= y hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think it was Josselin (cc= 'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was traveling. Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus likely= yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be rebuilt. But I also d= on't want to hold up any other branches longer than necessary as this has a= lready been waiting for some weeks. John From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 09:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner Cc: John Kehayias , Z572 , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.173071284315271 (code B ref 73288); Mon, 04 Nov 2024 09:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2024 09:34:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7tTF-0003y4-Sw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 04:34:02 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:44100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7tTD-0003xv-D1 for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 04:34:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:6b67:e390:8b00::1ce5]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F052727BBE2; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fang (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id adcc14bd; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:02:49 +0200") References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 09:33:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87fro72vi6.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Efraim Flashner writes: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >>=20 >> > Hello Guix, >> > >> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >> > tracked at . There is an update to >> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >> > >> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >> > >> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch >> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >> > other blockers. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > John >>=20 >> maybe is time to merge? >>=20 >> see https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates >> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85= .5% >> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux 79.4%, a= arch64-linux 89.0%. >>=20 >> Is there anything else in the way? > > Comparing them against master and against each other: > x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux > i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) > aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) > armhf: slight regression on bordeaux > ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux > riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) > > I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, > we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs > mesa-updates: > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates/package-changes?x86_64-linux-= change=3Dblocked&x86_64-linux-change=3Dstill-blocked&x86_64-linux-change=3D= unknown-to-blocked&x86_64-linux-change=3Dnew-blocked bordeaux substitute availability has been going up for mesa-updates, but it seems like a large number of changes hit master over the last week or so which are taking priority, so that'll slow any work on mesa-updates. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmcolQFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xfa/hAApvFsChwL3kQ50ZSAuz9g8EA2/TdsWVXu 13rk/gocAy+0gnnyX/0bObMl1XhTDFQbtWeTHajn6BNlNDNQk7jKk6MA1IVpUrz7 N3elEg3u0ceGL/2WiVJXPnE9wlzQp4su/qpOi1lVQz0Slg95t0Jdhta5NYDXhj4I 8hM4ORlUC2xgmv9B8eO2Zv3aD/VYBKPTVSgB4P9A58s8jW3znlCnNNLn/azEUvap gAhu+kXOyodZMyTFxldokMS/9dpnoa3rLRgojJxwijyhxVzxrIa2+gQAYBDwmvQe vj2P36mnbl99vqU6lffGV6dEv53VQ/C4eSwZ7bKoj0uNvYmFVOQPYvhPJwO1iX4Z 4XjqIEDEg26IF7cCFXC7da1bVAOOg7DHNNAbO5zWHrOG6XZunu6NT8+1FEDfEg2B yUOdFH7FlW2u7rKqgs6i/92eS8m78CTbAsOnxXWMCcrS0jn5BltMMwXQf/taplPJ nB6zNBDBc9IfcKgUldmzYwh3pXrCUvPcg03WtQJ5KtW4QeNC3YPrhGl5q2/2TD1l PGV4OTTjCp/7+pKyMPlKrZg/sFrHV1+r4LQzursiQbDHaZBnupbcaom+UBGxe+/6 iAz/Bcg9t+1uHU4eV3Ht46wgXGSrube0s2Y0EP+modlGmo0RAK4ZS2k5S2SYETO6 ZIHzEBYuQQw= =PNOh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Z572 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, dev@jpoiret.xyz, efraim@flashner.co.il X-Debbugs-Original-To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: John Kehayias , Josselin Poiret , Efraim Flashner , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.17307390495107 (code B ref -1); Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:51:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2024 16:50:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41053 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t80Hw-0001KJ-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:50:49 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t80Hu-0001KD-LW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:50:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t80Hu-0004KS-9z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:50:46 -0500 Received: from smtp84.cstnet.cn ([159.226.251.84] helo=cstnet.cn) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t80Hr-0004QR-ED for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:50:46 -0500 Received: from m (unknown [107.174.64.25]) by APP-05 (Coremail) with SMTP id zQCowAAXKm5R+yhnNIyxDQ--.49060S2; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:50:30 +0800 (CST) From: Z572 In-Reply-To: <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> (John Kehayias via Guix-patches via's message of "Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:32:31 +0000") References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:50:20 +0800 Message-ID: <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-CM-TRANSID: zQCowAAXKm5R+yhnNIyxDQ--.49060S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJw1fXF43Kr4rJrWfCr47XFb_yoW5uw1UpF Z8JFy3Kw4Dt34SyF1Iv348XFnYyw13JasxXryYgryjq34qvFnaq39a9r4S9rZ7Ar43CF42 qr4Utr9rCr90v37anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Cb7Iv0xC_Kw4lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vEx4 A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UM2vj62AExVA0xI801c8C04v26x02cVCv0xWle2I262IY c4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wASzI0EjI02j7AqF2xKxwAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2 WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkE bVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwCY1x0262kKe7AKxVWUAVWUtwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrw CFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE 14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxK x2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI 0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jRAp5UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [107.174.64.25] X-CM-SenderInfo: x2kh0wxmxqyx3h6l2u1dvotugofq/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.226.251.84; envelope-from=zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn; helo=cstnet.cn X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: > Hi all, > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >>> >>> > Hello Guix, >>> > >>> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >>> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >>> > tracked at . There is an update to >>> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >>> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >>> > >>> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >>> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >>> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >>> > >>> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch >>> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >>> > other blockers. >>> > >>> > Thanks! >>> > John >>> >>> maybe is time to merge? >>> >>> see >>> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85.5% >>> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >>> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >>> >>> Is there anything else in the way? >> >> Comparing them against master and against each other: >> x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux >> i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) >> aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) >> armhf: slight regression on bordeaux >> ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux >> riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) >> >> I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, >> we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs >> mesa-updates: >> >> >> However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are >> substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably just >> needs to be sent through again. >> >> It looks okay to me > > I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch > of patches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just > waiting for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be > there as noted above after waiting for other branches and recent > Berlin issues. I have been running my system on this branch for a > couple weeks as well. > > However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I > remember) Sway hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think > it was Josselin (cc'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was > traveling. > > Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus > likely yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be > rebuilt. But I also don't want to hold up any other branches longer > than necessary as this has already been waiting for some weeks. i think we can merge this branch first, and setup a new branch to fix/update libva and mesa, people can use inferior to get have hardware acceleration package on new branch. WDYT? > > John --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfr6klGDOXiwIdX/bO1qpk+Gi3/AFAmco+0wACgkQO1qpk+Gi 3/CTVBAAifnetm5PBi1i9Zk601OehjQHyoRzHlCYQ0tL1rB1XCw9fwljVp9tMH/N ATY/+eoRzSc1Mg04Wwna41Us9t1+xh9nODkaaC9ge4+rCSiEVV6Q0Zs71OG2sUrI 0wfbsDp9Uufxq4L00JdWBV33QSvM9zo+JV6sLtadohSvOtPOt1Om97v5WAxuNPGr /Ls3NAKuubz8IXES1426T5u0X8w/H4GV4qfDupujMH86PntgxEP8im+sFu6nbvHN gVJQUS4KZ24znfGiaeyHf3ni1CBMyIMm70QvbQtSZRXiiQc1IAD4fopJBDR5o6u/ SPC1xTsKRYnfbW9q3uNqSpQqU/5/eoR6jyf4/aNRBYC4oB/Mci6beMrbfk/cE8gN /ynPemup7Nq28zVQsvPiCv8JTncepIGdtFi5uqc/F7Ra8Q772mBwmnjy46/+Mp/z b73utbd4ePRoWh0TE8ZBZlNJim1z3jC+/hic5r0f7lZLJOLw/HVwEfbli1vLBT5F 85XbVOcrSiOAW3xzKl2xg7+J04vqLcPjBBHNhtb9sn14sYisVLKyNxKPs/3cwHkC Mex/33mwPMvaO3dw99rUH0Hq6J9UlY02X2dZV2kzbHg7Vzu2QCYHuPDCFULVZ7Fk o+58RA0Ixm1LLM4osjMaw8Wm0COupJxOe6BHQovPPeJvafLR6Pk= =8XrE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 04:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Z572 Cc: dev@jpoiret.xyz, efraim@flashner.co.il, 73288@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Josselin Poiret , Efraim Flashner , John Kehayias via Guix-patches via , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173078017726736 (code B ref -1); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 04:17:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2024 04:16:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8AzI-0006x8-BO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:16:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47416) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8AzG-0006x2-Cn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:16:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8AzF-00080Z-QK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:16:13 -0500 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8AzD-0003lO-Bi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:16:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1730780160; x=1731039360; bh=Kz2NESCQuo/4sSiwlT/X3w2iHPItOOcQdArda+Pj+50=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=bBqK5f24K5DZT2P5C9RUBymIkRy0PHyVbUOL0ipSB6EyxsCXxmrMCRBVG0+aIuGld UqnAmeXoePRv1xBidu548GDXX6g2tM++VPUqtjHgCTf9owyvWKTYNH1BB5LEKg88A/ HHvOP9Z3UMwXnSfuQXoPN3stXucUv+s9kAbDvTgTGNr4Sff6M2tIgSC6rb58paDbGA 7thVTXFS657BtVVdRx/Z8SQ2judQ7qljteYNrYyPRxTn/7G8Sgv4vy+izjTbtXay7v BC/NZJ/9Q8Ltc/0MV0rq8DbksdEnP3aWdTdxcS1UHqvLNzifffNDJ5DY8zu3dITmiW 1b4GHboZXhilQ== Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 04:15:54 +0000 From: John Kehayias Message-ID: <87r07q9uz2.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 2f29ffe424984f655c948300cc89293db8eb7f5c MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.134; envelope-from=john.kehayias@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40134.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:50 AM, Z572 wrote: > John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >>>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >>>> >>>> > Hello Guix, >>>> > >>>> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >>>> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >>>> > tracked at . There is an update t= o >>>> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >>>> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >>>> > >>>> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >>>> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >>>> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >>>> > >>>> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to cat= ch >>>> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >>>> > other blockers. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks! >>>> > John >>>> >>>> maybe is time to merge? >>>> >>>> see >>>> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux = 85.5% >>>> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >>>> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >>>> >>>> Is there anything else in the way? >>> >>> Comparing them against master and against each other: >>> x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux >>> i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) >>> aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) >>> armhf: slight regression on bordeaux >>> ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux >>> riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) >>> >>> I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, >>> we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs >>> mesa-updates: >>> >>> >>> However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are >>> substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably jus= t >>> needs to be sent through again. >>> >>> It looks okay to me >> >> I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch >> of patches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just >> waiting for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be >> there as noted above after waiting for other branches and recent >> Berlin issues. I have been running my system on this branch for a >> couple weeks as well. >> >> However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I >> remember) Sway hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think >> it was Josselin (cc'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was >> traveling. >> >> Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus >> likely yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be >> rebuilt. But I also don't want to hold up any other branches longer >> than necessary as this has already been waiting for some weeks. > > i think we can merge this branch first, and setup a new branch to fix/upd= ate > libva and mesa, people can use inferior to get have hardware > acceleration package on new branch. WDYT? > Yes, sounds good. I did a rebase and deleted/pushed to mesa-updates. I'll c= heck in about 12 hours and will do the merge assuming it still looks good a= nd no sudden issues. Ah, did find the log I missed about Sway, seems it will be for the new vers= ion . So, I will do t= he merge and then we can do a new branch for libva, sway, etc. (and keep up= with mesa). Probably will just put it in the queue once build slots open u= p as I would like to (every time) keep it small and quick to keep it from b= ecoming harder to manage. Thanks all! John From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: John Kehayias Cc: Josselin Poiret , Z572 , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.17308030019825 (code B ref 73288); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2024 10:36:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43568 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8GvR-0002YP-4z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 05:36:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:52597) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8GvP-0002YJ-9F for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 05:36:40 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4314f38d274so62691055e9.1 for <73288@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 02:36:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730802938; x=1731407738; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UNsj6+x2lzEMl6u4PSTI67arOocajec7fkgum5D/e/4=; b=MJydF0Bp+03DeMj2SvyGUa6NJM4QAMLZK5rOBxMQGCxWv+q5zF/a1dr9xRwo6ZesV6 d8N3CDZa2aZhdWG4KHCS5e1tSetcnsJ4hATV3rrvYzu5exi5Z+2pC1NWAjiVMalKuJLB FXwK7Dk/5fHOpzaueAYHytiu0gmJdiK05I9zvAH/BDaLvd5/i5WZwlQpWpEB8pI0/zbE SfsFV80SrOgwTCn8WFHMbVfk7ne+CcqvssHl6lhc08+vw/Ve5IKAGWiDqBMznQVBP67n qAS+Y1mj18ZG20nM34vGj7nLaBj+rt+UZ2hNNiYPryS6l2RQfhY5zCbFz1sVTpNqEJ9l sSXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730802938; x=1731407738; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UNsj6+x2lzEMl6u4PSTI67arOocajec7fkgum5D/e/4=; b=WUw6akkRBHVjCXEW5cPcCV7x8OcTGorKQ+iUcihGZl2hhsi+kymH3U0Cuqg4LpnXl1 5z3WlaTPHrBd/sGCCedvK/suyLhBlpaXred/rlvTdIDSrfe8VCf+pVClv6+Q38D4A6Fz BlKsAWHvRuZG1A0psPRCN/rZF0lejQimfH6I1wCEJIK2pFJ58juXxKyiPJ/swrUOsUMc 6iwk5tC2M+8OLXOo9npr/NqU/brPpWkBM5asLkn1thJMv4wfibuZa9XTvV8ObHLyHALW Vt7BO/n7eWxQ2VaXJLytl/3jlWk6ghzTCuCsmkdj28XqxAyA59zH+8l+I2Fc1g6vf343 g22Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVZkWjR3Hi+/4PL9hds0FqRIunV6wD5O/01cp+syrQKyg8p0fGC8sIFkiqoSj5NaBD9by0awg==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOwm/fP2C5hB2rtQ5MLLZqVIS8I8ixzYsAzRFf6cqyUGliUrpG z5sPMQj+4cyYYk1Q9fYwpsBtadRu7udeQq3tHXagQDhg5FqKpxz8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEBK+vsAa6EPNdkhnaglhrIOw69uI7/DxSBLuVzJHXlTZud9IILONn2dGZjCzAwxC/E/GWiig== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3148:b0:431:557e:b40c with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4328327ce1fmr163401935e9.27.1730802937965; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 02:35:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([141.226.162.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-381c116c13asm15653791f8f.109.2024.11.05.02.35.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 02:35:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 12:35:33 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , John Kehayias , Z572 , Josselin Poiret , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87r07q9uz2.fsf@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tm5XmOKumhW9j7K7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r07q9uz2.fsf@protonmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --tm5XmOKumhW9j7K7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 04:15:54AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: > Yes, sounds good. I did a rebase and deleted/pushed to mesa-updates. I'll= check in about 12 hours and will do the merge assuming it still looks good= and no sudden issues. As expected, no change in the derivation for aarch64/armhf/riscv64/ppc64le --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --tm5XmOKumhW9j7K7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmcp9PIACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1H1Ew/9G4yzsINzNwMMJi92PE528r/dPURZouWrJOG16laiaj6YOhPJ5c2xQovX M5nqFbTNnLeng2AjXsK1rg1p1YXxQS1ZK0pyyBkWPFBwk98fqehDMJek0F/y9J2Q GHJwXFe+gHjKrKZb43PoqBsxjCvHi6j+bHHgQ2H7Jli+8bp/XKgDUDN1U2cPB8Ns Opl4KuXGO39uaJhvCEw8AZwh1FlUT9nkOisuLkzQcGq5yvXsqRxDuLnVWynUyMYB CDfZ6cBfKYfnPx5+9nTVhoYdNWWYgUsmQsSqZIumQ/QJ2GubamLQ53n+MWbbmSgI sj/Wjo2yAUP0joCVrx74m26jzPXx5wqdngJbnm0hGZLIvtooD7W1uwGjnPh62yVM u5h2ak39AG9hWQHrUVSW6Rn356lCve/OMZMYmrQC3CFwHqCiQETFV1xfF3czCyZE GtdzmX0lx73wpnKvEtxJO1IHOE1JFFNmJ7kYu68UZK/Pufvp/zvkwJyT2arlEL5n 0LAvqxH/sydybrEkJ0hEsgHwHKXHKL9c9sCbpw6bPk8rNsti87+fEUm5Yr63TXk2 mJ8kItc0xsM3AsjeEHNx5L9Fg94i72RZzwZ2UyWD4d/0iQKEkkxjiUxmtgleEl4W d1+FdPk0/q4QXaDi5uiIIsMk79HyBWdF0D2EZOAeJ2gM0vZdLOk= =garu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tm5XmOKumhW9j7K7-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:42 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: John Kehayias Subject: bug#73288: closed (Re: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch) Message-ID: References: <87msida543.fsf@protonmail.com> <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 73288 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix-patches Reply-To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:50:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1730832602-2590-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1730832602-2590-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #73288: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 73288@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 73288: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D73288 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1730832602-2590-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 73288-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2024 18:49:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8OcF-0000ef-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:49:23 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:31513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8Oc9-0000e9-Ty for 73288-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:49:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1730832551; x=1731091751; bh=521yasW/Gyz+BiX7JWakXcccDgsT+dUPTSLeFTUnHSQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=X7i85jOD343xa7sk7PLpZnIH1AjwLdF8nfoQPToBPyE4o0FTk597FiLMomS+KAsSg DP95IJeT2o0flqg6wFwCycUXVdCNxConmU0iPxMvlTsMSMX7NqR0HHMsMplFck+urX FgprY5PWXeAaPdwdt9KXt0yP1BizsDhgQtkAKOAZcIyc/SvvSl43qDxTQpT13Ub0tB 3bPTnNhmHIDCXepAzGFht6ikQy/cxVcUfSwwudRCx0Xtw2QcCuxfGCZ01anZaxcCIG NnqWIeQ1pkDIHXTuSMqqLKmnya15DjaVQtF5EJrAnpeW71rcZahdIn8xXSNCZZ09Hi EzQoreHE20z/w== Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:49:07 +0000 To: 73288-done@debbugs.gnu.org From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87msida543.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 79fd9bbdcb606e65b23f3de5282f2dab1fa6a969 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 73288-done Cc: Josselin Poiret , Z572 , Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:15 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:50 AM, Z572 wrote: > >> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >>>>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >>>>> >>>>> > Hello Guix, >>>>> > >>>>> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >>>>> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >>>>> > tracked at . There is an update = to >>>>> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >>>>> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >>>>> > >>>>> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >>>>> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled ou= t >>>>> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >>>>> > >>>>> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to ca= tch >>>>> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >>>>> > other blockers. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks! >>>>> > John >>>>> >>>>> maybe is time to merge? >>>>> >>>>> see >>>>> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux= 85.5% >>>>> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >>>>> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >>>>> >>>>> Is there anything else in the way? >>>> >>>> Comparing them against master and against each other: >>>> x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux >>>> i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) >>>> aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) >>>> armhf: slight regression on bordeaux >>>> ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux >>>> riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) >>>> >>>> I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However= , >>>> we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs >>>> mesa-updates: >>>> >>>> >>>> However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are >>>> substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably ju= st >>>> needs to be sent through again. >>>> >>>> It looks okay to me >>> >>> I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch >>> of patches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just >>> waiting for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be >>> there as noted above after waiting for other branches and recent >>> Berlin issues. I have been running my system on this branch for a >>> couple weeks as well. >>> >>> However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I >>> remember) Sway hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think >>> it was Josselin (cc'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was >>> traveling. >>> >>> Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus >>> likely yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be >>> rebuilt. But I also don't want to hold up any other branches longer >>> than necessary as this has already been waiting for some weeks. >> >> i think we can merge this branch first, and setup a new branch to fix/up= date >> libva and mesa, people can use inferior to get have hardware >> acceleration package on new branch. WDYT? >> > > Yes, sounds good. I did a rebase and deleted/pushed to mesa-updates. > I'll check in about 12 hours and will do the merge assuming it still > looks good and no sudden issues. > > Ah, did find the log I missed about Sway, seems it will be for the new > version . So, I > will do the merge and then we can do a new branch for libva, sway, > etc. (and keep up with mesa). Probably will just put it in the queue > once build slots open up as I would like to (every time) keep it small > and quick to keep it from becoming harder to manage. > > Thanks all! > John Merged! Closing. Thanks all. ------------=_1730832602-2590-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2024 02:38:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1da-0006RX-A0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:50 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1dX-0006RJ-2f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1dJ-0004mB-82 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:34 -0400 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sq1dH-0000He-Kt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1726454300; x=1726713500; bh=9iym2db3foojUQmBcP3F2gzP1iMRUQaPZJGPBFRXLMM=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=mJ6cQFGVbCei5CzFNOa+zGp0iyhdjTZldCh1hhp4NOfSwSZPSlhxEdgLy0ozqKpuA +ZSNC3ozXDky/K3nh+i5cotjcaXqS+Hg6MT0knll/by1+KTDdLSUUxkUCvfn5T4Ksy 7ljyYA+7xq7+/dHXUM2fR+gubbz9SAKjYZukfoJrAglrNwEtQsbx01qLOCg+bIZVTL BAGSBBdrUYb3+EEs6XnNxbGbbaElATAcpw2Umki/pabzJcWPzS6AY3bn9Vtorp63dh TPVAyXbZA2x+jMGhJ1sKUebbUkQ1xgUU3p3C3/TBVlSn/5MFBlp2ZOPVCkN1lY+T75 lI2Zwkb7ih6QQ== Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:38:16 +0000 To: Guix-patches From: John Kehayias Subject: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 904cfd75f5579614973d1922d37b2b28b0ee2b52 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.22; envelope-from=john.kehayias@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4322.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello Guix, The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for merging. Besides s= ome other fixes and updates, the main series is tracked at . There is an update to add NVK support to mesa for x86_= 64-linux which I need to review and push (and rebase to get more fixes from= master). Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as well on = Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out on Bordeaux. P= erhaps Efraim can chime in there. With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch up a= gain in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of other blocker= s. Thanks! John ------------=_1730832602-2590-1--