GNU bug report logs - #73262
[PATCH] gnu: openblas: Add debug output.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 73262 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 73262 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Artyom Bologov <mail <at> aartaka.me>
To: Guix Patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Add debug output.
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 06:48:38 +0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi y'all,

This patch adds a debug output to OpenBLAS and adjusts build flags
accordingly. The final non-debug build is likely unaffected by DEBUG=1,
because Guix strips the debug symbols out anyway. Note that this change
likely requires checking the CI for the package, like with bug #73058.

[0001-gnu-openblas-Add-debug-output.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Thanks,
-- 
Artyom Bologov
https://aartaka.me

Message #8 received at 73262 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Artyom Bologov <mail <at> aartaka.me>
Cc: rekado <at> elephly.net, zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com, laurent.gatto <at> gmail.com,
 73262 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Add debug output.
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:44:29 +0200

Hello Artyom,

your patch looks good and still applies; I am building the package right
now. We have three openblases in Guix:
- openblas, aka openblas <at> 0.3.29, has no dependents, which surprised me,
  until I found
- openblas <at> 0.3.20 with 8824 depending packages.
- openblas-ilp64 is a 64 bit version with 331 depending packages (all
  julia unless I overlooked any).

Many of the 8824 depending packages come from R, but there are many
more.

So I am cc-ing the R team; do you think it would make sense to add this
commit to your r-team branch?

Or maybe I can try to run a science-team update at some point in time,
there is also an fftw patch and a bc patch to apply with lots of
rebuilds.

Andreas

Message #11 received at 73262 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 73262 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com, laurent.gatto <at> gmail.com,
 Artyom Bologov <mail <at> aartaka.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Add debug output.
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 20:15:29 +0200

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:

> So I am cc-ing the R team; do you think it would make sense to 
> add this
> commit to your r-team branch?

Yes, on the r-team branch we're updating the default openblas, so 
all
dependents of openblas are rebuilt anyway.

-- 
Ricardo

Message #14 received at 73262 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 73262 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com, laurent.gatto <at> gmail.com,
 Artyom Bologov <mail <at> aartaka.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Add debug output.
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:32:57 +0200

Am Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 08:15:29PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> Yes, on the r-team branch we're updating the default openblas, so all
> dependents of openblas are rebuilt anyway.

Excellent, thanks!

I can confirm that the package builds on x86_64; I did not test the
patch anywhere else.

Andreas

Message #19 received at 73262-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 73262-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com,
 laurent.gatto <at> gmail.com, Artyom Bologov <mail <at> aartaka.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Add debug output.
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 10:36:57 +0200

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:

> Am Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 08:15:29PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> Yes, on the r-team branch we're updating the default openblas, 
>> so all
>> dependents of openblas are rebuilt anyway.
>
> Excellent, thanks!
>
> I can confirm that the package builds on x86_64; I did not test 
> the
> patch anywhere else.

I've applied it on top of the rebased r-team branch with commit 
f05ee6c81556f86c477e84404c7b276f09a24568.
(The commit id will change several more times as the r-team branch 
waits in the queue.)

-- 
Ricardo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.