GNU bug report logs -
#73244
Emacs29.3 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.41
Previous Next
Full log
Message #22 received at 73244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ping!
> Cc: ajh <at> ajhurst.org, 73244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 14:19:12 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
>
> > From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
> > Cc: "John Hurst" <ajh <at> ajhurst.org>, 73244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:58:00 +0800
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > >> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:42:50 +1000
> > >> From: "John Hurst" <ajh <at> ajhurst.org>
> > >>
> > >> The bug I have, since upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 and install emacs29 is that the initial frame has width x height of 20 x 9, even though I have a .Xresources file containing
> > >> Emacs*geometry: 100x40+1900+0
> > >> end a default-frame-alist of
> > >> Value:
> > >> ((font . "Monospace-10")
> > >> (height . 42)
> > >> (width . 90)
> > >> (tool-bar-lines . 0)
> > >> (menu-bar-lines . 1)
> > >> (top . 0)
> > >> (left . 1200))
> > >> Original value was nil
> > >> set up by my .emacs file.
> > >>
> > >> Using either the pull-down File->New Frame, or C-x 5 2, both generate new frames of the 20 x 9 size.
> > >>
> > >> I can send the .emacs file if needed, but note that "emacs -D' also gives the same default size of 20 x 9, so I don't think it is a problem with my .emacs file - which did work OK under Ubuntu 22.04 and emacs28.
> > >
> > > Po Lu, any comments or suggestions?
> >
> > >From what I've heard, the culprit is rather the upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04
> > than to Emacs 29, and the problem will disappear if Emacs is configured
> > with another toolkit than GTK.
>
> Does it mean that GTK which comes with Ubuntu 24.04 is unusable with
> Emacs? What exactly in GTK causes this?
>
>
>
>
This bug report was last modified 267 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.