GNU bug report logs -
#73197
[PATCH] gnu: julia: Update to 1.9.3.
Previous Next
Full log
Message #20 received at 73197 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
I am resuming this patch. And I would like to have it merge before the
end of this month. In other words, I would like to mention this update
in the Guix HPC annual report.
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 at 10:24, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
>> > Let me take a look at those failure to see how bad it is.
Could we have a julia-team branch and that branch built by CI? It would
help by saving some resources.
From my numbers, ~230 Julia packages fail. Over ~300 packages.
>> I would suggest to have julia-next.
[...]
>> Users willing stable just install ’julia’ and ’julia-’ packages.
>> Adventurous users install ’julia-next’ and ’julia-*-next’.
> The problem is that the julia-build-system needs to be adapted to the
> newer versions of Julia.
Yes, you have the same with all *-next “compilers” applied to their
packages: emacs-next, ghc-next, guile-next or python-next. Somehow,
there is no guarantee that the python-build-system works equally for
both python and python-next, and there is no guarantee neither that
python-* packages build with python-next as Python “compiler”.
Somehow, there is the stable and the adventurous. :-)
Well, let keep that aside and let rediscuss it again for Julia 1.10 or
1.11 and let focus on making Julia 1.9.3 the default.
Please note that we already have a Julia package that’s half packaged:
julia-precompiletools. The test suite fails because the
julia-build-system has not been adapted yet. :-)
Cheers,
simon
This bug report was last modified 106 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.