GNU bug report logs -
#73152
[PATCH 0/6] NSS updates
Previous Next
Full log
Message #77 received at 73152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Liliana, Christopher,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Note: the explanation should come before the ChangeLog.
Fixed, thanks.
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:
> Maybe there's a more elegant way to share a value between phases
> in the
> builder, but I think even doing it via an environment variable
> is still
> preferable than using a procedure to create the package. I've
> spent many
> hours debugging complex functional and performance related
> issues caused
> by procedures returning packages, and while it's a powerful
> tool, it's
> something to be avoided unless necessary.
I adopted this suggestion, and it made for a much cleaner setup.
Thank you!
The current patch series is working and ready for review. I
haven’t rebuilt all the dependent packages (and QA is down, so I’m
not sure whether it has, but it’s had a week to do so), but the
direct nss/nspr changes build and seem to work for me.
> In terms of how to make this kind of change, I'd split it in to
> two
> parts. Introducing the environment variable can definately go to
> the
> core-packages-team branch in my opinion, and the package updates
> could
> maybe as well, but I'd think of it as two separate patch series.
This patch series updates nss, but leaves nss-rapid for a later
series. I’d prefer not to block this on core-package-team, but if
you feel strongly that some or all of these changes should go
there, I will direct them. Given that it’s been 8 months since I
opened the series and that will extend the timeline greatly, I’m
disinclined to complicate things more -- and would likely end up
needing to move all the changes to Codeberg with the added delay.
WDYT?
-- Ian
This bug report was last modified 22 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.