GNU bug report logs - #73137
[PATCH] gnu: ddd: Update to 3.4.1.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>

Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:38:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #20 received at 73137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: help-guix <at> gnu.org, 73137 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: this-package-input vs. propagated-inputs in package definition
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:51:13 -0700

OK I don't know if this is "implementation detail" or a bug, or is as
intended, that

>considering the current implementation, you cannot reach the propagated-inputs of the inputs using this-package-inputs.

(seems like a bug to me)

Also, would the same package be in the input list and the
propagated-input list be a problem?

On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 7:24 AM Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > I had to add freefont as input to ddd to make this work.
>
> BTW, for the package ddd, is freetype an input or also a
> propagated-input ?
This bug report was last modified 231 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.