Subject: [bug#73137] this-package-input vs. propagated-inputs in package definition

From: Andy Tai <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:51:13 -0700

OK I don't know if this is "implementation detail" or a bug, or is as
intended, that

>considering the current implementation, you cannot reach the propagated-inputs of the inputs using this-package-inputs.

(seems like a bug to me)

Also, would the same package be in the input list and the
propagated-input list be a problem?

On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 7:24 AM Simon Tournier <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > I had to add freefont as input to ddd to make this work.
>
> BTW, for the package ddd, is freetype an input or also a
> propagated-input ?