Subject: Re: bug#73098: setopt float warning unexpected

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:22:06 +0200

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

> I tend to agree.  If the type doesn't accept the value, you can use
> something lower-level than `setopt` [...]

What would that be in case the option has a custom setter function?

Michael.